I-66 Widening Plan A Major GOP Pledge
Kilgore Promises 6 Lanes Inside Beltway
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Saturday, October 22, 2005
The promise was made not once, not twice, but seven times by Republican gubernatorial candidate Jerry W. Kilgore.
"I'll widen I-66 inside the Beltway," he said during the Sept. 13 debate with his Democratic opponent, Timothy M. Kaine, sponsored by the Fairfax County Chamber of Commerce.
It's a pledge the GOP candidate has embraced boldly. In television ads, speeches and interviews, Kilgore has said that one of Northern Virginia's most controversial proposals -- the widening of four-lane Interstate 66 in Arlington County to six lanes -- can be done with a bit of political will and the efficient use of federal money.
But completing a project that has been repeatedly proposed, discussed and postponed since that 10-mile stretch of I-66 opened in 1982 would be a daunting task for Kilgore.
Costs and community opposition make it difficult for any local leaders to advance a major transportation proposal. In Maryland, Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. (R), who set construction of the intercounty connector as a major goal during his 2002 campaign, still hopes to begin building before the end of his term.
The Arlington communities along the I-66 route have long been concerned about noise, air pollution and traffic congestion associated with the highway. The Arlington County Board, which tried to block construction in the first place, continues to oppose any widening.
"If the widening occurs, it will be over the objections of the local community," said Jay Fisette (D) chairman of the County Board, which passed a resolution in the spring reaffirming its opposition.
Although county officials would not have final say on a state project, opponents would be able to testify at hearings held by state agencies weighing community interests.
"We understand local concerns, but this is a regional project," said J. Tucker Martin, a spokesman for Kilgore. "This would be for the good of the region and is a priority for Jerry Kilgore."
Kilgore says the two-way widening can be accomplished within the existing right of way, without taking any property.
Under his plan, a 6.5-mile stretch from the Rosslyn tunnel to the Dulles Connector Road would be widened first. Kilgore says the state then should study the feasibility of widening the road through the Rosslyn tunnel and across the Theodore Roosevelt Bridge into Washington.
According to Virginia Department of Transportation officials and other planners, Kilgore is correct in asserting that the road can be widened to six lanes without taking private property and within the existing right of way.


![[The Presidential Field]](http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2007/09/17/GR2007091700670.gif)




