Pentagon Moves to Alter Personnel System

Some Unions Prepare to Sue Over Proposed Changes in Labor Relations Provisions

Gordon R. England, the acting deputy secretary of defense, said most Defense Department workers will support the National Security Personnel System.
Gordon R. England, the acting deputy secretary of defense, said most Defense Department workers will support the National Security Personnel System. (By Heesoon Yim -- Associated Press)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Christopher Lee
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, October 27, 2005

Pentagon officials announced yesterday that they soon will begin implementing a controversial personnel system that they believe can withstand the kind of legal challenge that has hampered a similar plan at the Department of Homeland Security.

The National Security Personnel System, which eventually will cover 650,000 civilian employees, will replace the familiar 15-grade General Schedule pay system with one in which raises are linked to annual performance evaluations.

The new work rules also would curtail the power of labor unions and make it easier to hire, promote and discipline employees -- all in the name of making the Defense Department more nimble in the struggle against terrorism.

The new system gives the federal government's largest department "the opportunity to provide an environment for our people to excel, to be challenged and to be rewarded," Gordon R. England, the acting deputy secretary of defense, said in a briefing for reporters yesterday.

"I continue to believe the vast majority of our people will embrace NSPS because of the opportunities it provides them and the challenges they will have," he added.

The early reviews are not so favorable. At least five federal employee unions, led by the American Federation of Government Employees, say they will file a lawsuit in federal court to challenge the labor relations portions of the new system.

The unions contend that the new work rules would gut collective bargaining in violation of federal law. And they maintain that the department did not live up to its obligation to consult with employees' representatives in developing a new labor management system.

A similar lawsuit against Homeland Security has effectively delayed the implementation of a new pay system there by as much as a year.

In August, U.S. District Judge Rosemary M. Collyer faulted the new DHS system for undermining employees' rights to collective bargaining, and blocked implementation of new rules governing labor relations and employee appeals. DHS has not said whether it will appeal.

Mark Roth, AFGE's general counsel, said the Pentagon's new system is similarly flawed. "They've done a lot of the same things in these regs that Judge Collyer found illegal in our DHS lawsuit," he said. "They've changed the terminology, but it's still the same substance."

The department will publish the new work rules in the Federal Register today, triggering a 30-day congressional review period. Pentagon officials hope to implement the labor relations portions -- including a new internal labor relations board controlled by the defense secretary to resolve labor management disputes -- department-wide immediately after that.

Pay raises for 2006 would be awarded according to the current system. About 113,000 employees would move to the new pay system by April, with all of them having to go through the new annual performance evaluations for at least a portion of their raises in 2007.


CONTINUED     1        >


© 2005 The Washington Post Company