Coming of 'Pay Bands' Spurs Curiosity of Defense Employees
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
The Pentagon plan to overhaul workplace rules for about 650,000 Defense Department civil service employees does not answer the big questions: What do the new salary scales look like, and where do employees fit in them?
Numerous Diary readers at Defense agencies across the country say they are eagerly awaiting "pay bands" in hopes that they will provide a clue as to their future compensation. Although the Pentagon has raised employee expectations -- and anxiety, in some cases -- it appears to be in a race against time to provide employees with more information.
Under the Pentagon plan, the initial wave of employees, some 65,000, will convert to the new pay-for-performance system in February. Pentagon officials expect to make that deadline, but they also acknowledge that many details remain to be worked out.
Under the plan, the National Security Personnel System will jettison the General Schedule, which has 15 grades and provides predictable pay raises, and replace it with broad occupational groups. Within these groups, Defense will set up pay bands, which probably will take in two or more of the old GS grades.
Many managers in test projects reported that pay bands make it easier to offer higher starting salaries and provide more flexibility to give raises to the best workers.
But details on the number of career groups and the number of pay bands for each career group remain under development. The pay bands will be described in "implementing issuances," the Pentagon's jargon for internal directives.
Before the Pentagon issues a directive, it has to clear a few hurdles. The final regulation for the NSPS, for instance, was issued this week, and that triggered a 30-day review period by Congress. Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and George V. Voinovich (R-Ohio), who oversee federal workforce issues in the Senate, probably will hold a hearing Thursday on the NSPS, aides said yesterday.
Once the 30-day congressional review ends, Pentagon officials will meet with union representatives to finish development of the pay bands and discuss implementing directives. The talks, however, may not be productive. Attorneys for the American Federation of Government Employees expect to file a lawsuit against the regulation in mid-November, contending that the Pentagon is trying to undermine collective bargaining and curb employee rights.
The Pentagon, in writing a final regulation, modified parts of its plan, including a section on performance management.
Because job performance ratings will determine the size of pay raises, the Pentagon said, it will give employees covered by union agreements two choices to dispute job ratings they consider unfair or inaccurate. Employees may use the grievance process outlined in their union contract -- such as arbitration -- or use an internal "administrative reconsideration" process, the final regulation said.
The first performance-based pay raises are scheduled for early 2007, officials said.
Pay Freeze?
Seven Republican senators have proposed freezing pay raises for federal employees, with the exception of law enforcement and military personnel, to help pay for government spending in response to hurricanes Katrina and Rita.


