Page 2 of 2   <      

His Word vs. That of Reporters and Officials

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

If the case goes to trial, the indictment suggests that Fitzgerald will rely significantly on the testimony of NBC newsman Tim Russert, Time correspondent Matthew Cooper and New York Times reporter Judith Miller to show that Libby lied to the FBI and the federal grand jury in Washington. Each of the three told investigators things that did not nearly mesh with Libby's narrative.

"Some people may have had a question going into today whether this would be a one-on-one of Lewis Libby against Judith Miller," said Richman, a former colleague of Fitzgerald's. "What this makes clear is that . . . there will be a reinforcement among the different press witnesses."

Libby's false statements, according to the indictment, began in October and November 2003 in two interviews with FBI agents and continued in two March 2004 grand jury sessions.

The vice presidential aide told his questioners that Russert asked him in July 2003 whether he knew that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA. Libby said the newsman told him that the word about Plame was out among reporters. "And I said, 'No, I don't know that,' " Libby told the grand jury. He said Russert's questions surprised him, that he remembered "being taken aback by it."

Yet Russert told investigators -- and repeated yesterday on camera -- that he never discussed Wilson with Libby. He said their telephone conversation on July 10 or 11 was about an unrelated complaint from Libby about NBC cable channel coverage.

The indictment not only disputes Libby's account of his conversation with Russert, but also charges that Libby lied about his reaction. He could not have been surprised, even if Russert had told him about Plame, because he already knew about her existence and her relationship to Wilson.

Fitzgerald cites nine prior Libby conversations involving at least seven people, all concerning Plame's CIA employment. They started a month before Libby spoke with Russert, the indictment charges.

Among the seven were Cheney, then-presidential press secretary Ari Fleischer, and a CIA national security briefer. Others included Cheney's top press aide, the vice president's counsel and Miller.

Libby also stands accused of lying to the FBI and the grand jury about a July 12 conversation with Cooper. In Libby's version, he told Cooper that he had learned from other reporters about Plame's identity as a CIA officer and that he did not know one way or another.

"I said, 'Reporters are telling us that. I don't know if it's true. . . .' I think I said, 'I don't know if he has a wife, but this is what we're hearing,' " Libby told the grand jury on March 5, 2004. Later that month, he repeated his statement to the grand jury.

He added: "I told a couple reporters what other reporters had told us, and I don't see that as a crime."

But the indictment states that Cooper recalled events differently. Cooper testified, according to the indictment, that Libby had confirmed "without elaboration or qualification" that he had heard Plame was Wilson's husband and had played a role in sending him to Africa to investigate President Bush's statements about Iraq's nuclear weapons program.

Libby told the grand jury he had a similar conversation with Miller of the Times on July 12 about what other reporters ostensibly were saying, and that he did not know whether it was correct. In fact, according to the indictment, Libby first revealed the potential CIA affiliation of Wilson's wife to Miller nearly three weeks earlier.

"On its face, it's easy to follow, clear and hard-hitting," said Lanny Breuer, a former attorney for President Bill Clinton who recently represented former national security adviser Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger on charges of removing and destroying classified documents. "This entire case turns on the memories of the key witnesses, and the credibility of Mr. Libby and the witnesses who testified to the grand jury."

Staff writer Susan Schmidt contributed to this report.


<       2


© 2005 The Washington Post Company