Economy Watch Live Updates on the Financial Crisis | MORE » | Business Home »

Marketers Dress Up Pitches to Look Official

The Direct Marketing Association's ethics committee reviews solicitations that appear to be misleading.
The Direct Marketing Association's ethics committee reviews solicitations that appear to be misleading. (The Washington Post)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Caroline E. Mayer
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, November 1, 2005

Some direct mailers are pushing the envelope.

Mailboxes are being filled with increasingly urgent, seemingly official messages from the government or banks.

But they're not. They're from marketers who are simply trying to get a consumer's attention in the daily clutter of bills, catalogues and advertisements.

There's the envelope with the logo of a house, similar to one used by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, alerting the recipient of a "rate overpayment notification." Inside is a refinancing solicitation.

Or there's the yellow letter that on the outside bears a Statue of Liberty symbol and the words "United States of America" in Gothic print -- similar to a check issued by the U.S. Treasury. Inside, it's just another refinancing bid.

"We are seeing more than we'd like to see" of these misleading envelopes, said Patricia Kachura, senior vice president of ethics and consumer affairs for the Direct Marketing Association.

Some envelopes, she said, make it appear that the letters inside are notices about an existing financial account. Still others make it seem as if they are from a government agency, and many of the mailings make it appear that what's inside "is much more urgent than it actually is," Kachura said.

"From a consumer perspective, when a mailing misleads consumers as to who sent it and why it was sent, then it could be considered deceptive," she said. Her organization's ethics committee reviews at least three questionable envelopes monthly, often asking for corrections. So far, she said, all challenged envelopes have been changed or the mailing has been halted.

Especially concerned about solicitations that appear to come from the government, the Federal Trade Commission plans to post today a consumer alert about one particular scam that has prompted several consumers, especially senior citizens, to send thousands of dollars overseas.

"We are seeing people trying to use the government's good name to get consumers to part with their money," said Tara Flynn, an assistant director in the FTC's consumer protection bureau.

The scam is a new variation of an age-old sweepstakes fraud in which consumers are told that they have won thousands, sometimes millions, of dollars but that to get those winnings they first have to send in some sort of payment. Winnings are never delivered.

Under the latest scams, consumers have received mailings and phone calls from agents purporting to be from "the national consumer protection agency," the "national sweepstakes bureau" (a nonexistent agency), the "sweepstakes security commission" (also nonexistent), the FTC or the Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (a real agency that regulates the export of sensitive goods and technologies), government officials say. To enhance their credibility, many of these telephone solicitations use Internet technology to make it appear that the phone calls come from a Washington number with the 202 area code.


CONTINUED     1        >


© 2005 The Washington Post Company