Page 2 of 2   <      

Katrina Recovery Officials Unsure What's Been Spent

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Doyle said he had not heard of such warnings, but that they are not in line with Corps policies.

With more than $60 billion already allocated for Katrina relief and more expected, various watchdogs inside and outside the government have been looking hard at how that money is being distributed.

"Obligations are being made at a rate of $275 million a day, in an unstable environment and in an expedited manner," said Richard L. Skinner, the Department of Homeland Security's inspector general. "When you mix it all together, it is a potentially perfect recipe for fraud, waste and abuse."

Skinner said his office has begun looking at the price being charged for installing tarps, or "blue roofs." He added, "On the surface it appears to be too much."

The Government Accountability Office is also monitoring reconstruction spending. A $39 million sole-source deal the Corps signed for portable classrooms in Mississippi has already raised eyebrows among GAO investigators. The contract went to an Alaskan Native corporation headquartered in North Carolina, though a Mississippi firm claims it could have done the work for about half of what the government paid.

David E. Cooper, the GAO's director of acquisition and sourcing management, said contracting officers at the Corps may have relied too much on the vendor for information as they crafted the deal's terms. "We have concerns that the government may be paying more than necessary" for the classrooms, Cooper testified.

The committee has been looking into the government's response to Katrina for more than a month, but Chairman Thomas M. Davis III (R-Va.) said it is still awaiting critical documents from the Department of Homeland Security, the White House and the Pentagon. "Without the other documents, we don't get a complete picture," Davis said.

The committee has received copies of some of former FEMA director Michael D. Brown's e-mail exchanges with DHS staff members, but not others that he testified he exchanged with the White House in the days before and after Katrina hit the Gulf Coast, said Rep. Charlie Melancon (D-La.). The latest batch of e-mails to be released paints Brown as out of touch, he said.

FEMA began to plan for the evacuation of pets only after newspaper articles appeared noting that some victims were refusing to leave their homes without them, according to e-mails the committee released yesterday. "I want us to start planning for dealing with pets," Brown said in a Sept. 8 e-mail, 10 days after Hurricane Katrina hit the Gulf Coast. "If evacuees are refusing to leave because they can't take their pets with them, I understand that."

More than a week earlier, as New Orleans was filling with water, Brown was attending to his own pets. Responding to an e-mail on Aug. 30 asking, "U ok?," Brown said: "I'm not answering that question, but do have a question. Do you know of anyone who dog-sits?"


<       2


© 2005 The Washington Post Company