Anti-Terror Measure Rejected in Britain
Parliament Vote Deals Major Setback to Blair
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Thursday, November 10, 2005
LONDON, Nov. 9 -- The House of Commons on Wednesday soundly defeated an anti-terrorism measure championed by Prime Minister Tony Blair, dealing him one of the most significant political setbacks of his eight years in office.
The lower house of Parliament voted 322 to 291 against a proposal to allow suspects in terrorism cases to be held for as many as 90 days without charge, up from the current 14. It was Blair's first loss in a major vote in that house since he took office in 1997.
Critics likened the measure to the policies of apartheid-era South Africa. But Blair called it crucial to national security and campaigned intensely for it. He worked privately to rally skeptical legislators from his ruling Labor Party and recalled two top cabinet members, Chancellor Gordon Brown and Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, from overseas trips to be present for Wednesday's vote.
In the end, 49 members of his party deserted him, a record number in a Commons vote.
Later in the day, legislators agreed to increase the time suspects can be held to 28 days and approved language in Blair's anti-terrorism package to create the crime of "glorification of terrorism." The bill also has provisions to toughen penalties for terrorist-related activities and widen government powers to ban organizations deemed to support terrorism.
But all political attention focused on the defeat of the 90-day proposal, on which Blair had expended much political capital. The vote adds to his burdens as he faces growing questions about his ability to govern.
After his party won its third consecutive election in May, albeit with a smaller majority than in the past, Blair said he would step down at some point before his current term concludes. Brown is almost universally seen as his likely successor.
Blair has been the White House's most important ally in the Iraq war, committing about 8,500 troops and sometimes functioning as de facto spokesman for the foreign coalition there. But the war remains extremely unpopular in Britain and has helped drag his approval ratings down.
In the past week, a key ally of the prime minister's has resigned from the cabinet and the former British ambassador to the United States has released a book critical of Blair.
"He's no longer Teflon Tony -- he's mortal," said Peter Riddell, political columnist for the London newspaper the Times and author of several books on Blair and British politics.
Riddell said the defeat was not politically fatal for Blair, but the "remarkable" defection of so many Labor legislators meant that Blair would have a hard time pushing through his ambitious domestic agenda, which includes reforms in education and health. "He's now at the mercy of Parliament," Riddell said.
Conservative Party leader Michael Howard immediately called for Blair to resign, telling reporters that "this has so diminished his authority." Charles Kennedy, leader of the third major party, the Liberal Democrats, said Blair would be "increasingly seen as a lame duck, and lack conviction, credibility and the persuasion that a prime minister needs."





