Analysis
Kaine Had Help, But He Did His Part
Virginia Gov.-elect Timothy M. Kaine introduces members of his transition team.
(By Robert A. Reeder -- The Washington Post)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Thursday, November 10, 2005
Mark R. Warner and George W. Bush are getting the credit and the blame for the surprisingly wide Democratic victory in Tuesday's Virginia governor election. But two other politicians also deserve scrutiny.
"I think we're going to have to look very carefully at two individuals -- Tim Kaine and Jerry Kilgore -- to see what they did right and what they did wrong," said state Sen. Jay O'Brien (R-Fairfax), "rather than look for broad conclusions" about the meaning of the race.
Politicians and analysts picking through details of Lt. Gov. Timothy M. Kaine's victory over the former Republican attorney general found evidence to support almost any theory -- anger against Bush, enthusiasm for Warner, Kilgore's negative campaign tactics. And to that end, it suggests that Tuesday's election, like most, was unique to the time and a result of many coinciding factors, not the least of which may be that Kaine ran a better campaign.
Kaine was blessed with an electorate that was pretty happy with the direction of the state and an endorsement from fellow Democrat Warner, to whom Virginians give much of the credit. But that doesn't mean the 47-year-old former Richmond mayor ran the same winning campaign that Warner debuted four years ago.
While Warner appealed to rural voters with a NASCAR racer and a promise of economic development, Kaine targeted the state's urban areas and the people who lived near them.
"It was all about the suburbs," said Kaine pollster Peter Brodnitz, when asked whether he was surprised Kaine had won in Loudoun and Prince William counties, usually safe havens for a Republican candidate. "The whole strategy was designed for those people."
Although those voters may be socially conservative, Brodnitz said the more important issues for them are those that affect why they live where they live. That led to Kaine proposals on property tax relief, on spending more money on education, and to respond to their complaints about growth and traffic.
By contrast, Warner recalled how Kilgore made comments at the end of the campaign that he was the "pro-gun-owner, anti-tax, limited-government, anti-illegal-immigration, pro-public-safety, pro-death-penalty . . . trust-the-people conservative."
"Ninety-eight percent of the job is how you balance the budget, how you educate kids, how you deal with transportation," Warner said. "People like to see stuff getting done."
Kaine also connected with those voters, according to his campaign strategists, by talking about his religious background and the Catholic beliefs that formed his opposition to the death penalty, the issue that the Kilgore campaign thought would be the most damaging for him. "It allowed him to say he's not a liberal, he's someone who has values like yours," said Brodnitz.
Kaine rolled up a more than 100,000-vote margin north of the Rappahannock River but also had a big night in the suburbs and in the area of Hampton Roads and around Richmond. He won in reliably Republican Virginia Beach.
While Kilgore dealt with the same issues that Kaine addressed, his campaign was much more closely associated with the negative television commercials it aired to attack Kaine.


![[The Presidential Field]](http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2007/09/17/GR2007091700670.gif)




