Page 2 of 2   <      

Cell Phone Bank Robber Still a Face With No Name

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Chris McGoey, another consultant in California, said he thought the cell phone "could be a prop to make the cashier think she has backup outside."

But in reality, McGoey said, she's probably talking to a boyfriend, who could be waiting in a getaway car.

Once she's caught, though, the phone shtick could come in handy for her lawyer, McGoey said.

"I can visualize the defense already," McGoey said. "The real crook threatened to kill her or her family if she didn't rob these banks, and she was forced to keep the real crook on the cell phone to track the transaction."

Rehder and Fred Desroches, a sociology professor at the University of Waterloo in Ontario, said bank robbers tell them that stickups can be addictive.

"They said the sensation of walking out of a bank after a successful robbery is very akin to the high you get from a narcotic," Rehder said.

Jon Gould, acting director of the Administration of Justice program at George Mason University, said the cell phone bandit's reluctance to don a disguise showed "audacity that is quite impressive. Either audacity or stupidity."

Two of the most successful bank robbers of all time, the Trench Coat Robbers, robbed banks across the country for 15 years and committed the largest single bank holdup in U.S. history in 1997, the year they were finally caught: $4.4 million from a single branch in Tacoma, Wash. Two reasons for their success: They did not commit robberies near their home town of Kansas City, Mo., and they wore disguises (and trench coats).

The cell phone bandit's calm demeanor led some to theorize she was under someone's spell. Gould said, however: "She's not hypnotized. You can't hypnotize over the phone."

More likely, Rehder said, she is addicted to something and needs money to pay for it, though her clean appearance doesn't shout "drug addict."

Rehder said that more than 80 percent of one robber/one teller holdups are committed by addicts and that such holdups net only about $1,000 or $2,000. Northern Virginia police would not say how much money the cell phone bandit got in each holdup.

"She obviously has a need for cash on a regular basis," which could also come from financial hardship, said Rehder, although he said such cases are fewer.

After her photo appeared on national and local television shows yesterday, experts were surprised she wasn't quickly arrested. "I would put money on the fact that she's caught within a week," Gould said.

Fairfax County police said they had received only six tips by yesterday evening. "She may not be somebody that's local," said police spokeswoman Mary Ann Jennings, "or she may not have a very long history in our area."

Loudoun County sheriff's officials, who first released video of the county's holdup last week, said they had received several calls. "With the amount of attention she's getting," spokesman Kraig Troxell said, "somebody will recognize her."

And, perhaps, that person will call police on a cell phone.


<       2


© 2005 The Washington Post Company