Fix Up Schools, But Not With Faulty System
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Next month, D.C. Council members expect to cast a first vote on giving the city school system $1 billion to fix its pathetically decrepit buildings. They might as well stack the money on Pennsylvania Avenue and set it aflame.
Enter Washington's public schools and you see why many people wouldn't let their children visit most of these schools, let alone grow up inside them. They're wildly overheated, or the heat doesn't work. Busted windows, leaky roofs, befouled bathrooms, unusable gyms -- the situation in some buildings is revolting. Only a few schools have a working science lab. The state-of-the-art jails in Fairfax and Montgomery counties are nicer than the most-run-down D.C. schools.
But giving school administrators $1 billion without setting up a credible outside manager to run the program requires collective amnesia. "They can't handle the money they do have," says school board member Tommy Wells (Wards 5 and 6). "I can't get windows replaced in my schools even though the money is already there."
The system has flunked Maintenance 101 for 30 years. The last time the city tried to modernize schools, in 2000, the U.S. General Accounting Office reported a flop: "In some cases, construction began before the designs were complete."
Rebuild entire schools? The system can't manage a window installation.
So what's the answer? Call in the feds? Congress's ill-fated financial takeover of the school system in the '90s brought us the Army Corps of Engineers. Result: nada.
Outsource the job? Tell it to
St. Louis, which spent $5 million to hire a turnaround firm that privatized many functions, closed 21 schools and laid off 1,000 employees. Result: big salaries for executives, low pay for teachers, larger classes and no signs of success.
Is there any big, urban school system that has managed to rebuild itself?
Los Angeles has opened 32 schools in the past year, many with alluring, edgy designs. The schools -- imagine this happening here -- joined with developers to add affordable housing on some new campuses. Outside architects, engineers and managers make sure projects are on time, on budget.
Chicago hired local architects to set renovation priorities. Principals and residents decided how to spend repair money. Construction and finance professionals monitor the projects.
The obvious solution in the District is to wed the $1 billion renovation fund to a supervisory authority of construction pros. But with six council members seeking higher office next year, the headline-grabbing fund is being set up first. Cart, then horse.



