washingtonpost.com
Army's Plan to Detail Sex Assaults Criticized
Victims' Privacy Concerns Are Cited

Associated Press
Saturday, November 26, 2005

An Army plan to develop a database of sexual assaults is meeting resistance from lawmakers and members of an advocacy group, who say it could invade victims' privacy.

In a letter to Army Secretary Francis J. Harvey, 15 members of Congress said the new system would deter victims of sexual assaults from reporting crimes and seeking treatment, and they asked him not to collect or store personal information or medical records in the database.

The proposal comes after sex assault scandals in the military and ongoing efforts by the Pentagon to respond to those problems. The Air Force Academy in Colorado is still struggling to recover from complaints that dozens of female cadets were assaulted and then punished when they reported it. And a recent survey by the Department of Veterans Affairs found that six in 10 women who served in the National Guard and reserves say they were sexually harassed or assaulted.

"Victims of sexual assault experience traumatic, life-changing events," said Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney (D-N.Y.). "We should work to protect their privacy, not compromise it."

The planned Army system would include the victim's name, Social Security number, date of birth and other demographic information as well as military service data, assault investigation and police reports, medical and other support records, and any actions taken against offenders.

A 30-day comment period on the plan ended Friday. No decision has been made, Pentagon spokesman Hank Minitrez said.

"Great care will be taken to ensure that both victim and alleged offender personal information and privacy are maintained," Minitrez, said adding that fewer than 10 people in the entire Army could have access to the personal identifying information. He said others would have access only to summary reports and non-personal identifying information.

The National Organization for Woman has called on its supporters to send an e-mail to the Army asking that the program be delayed because documenting a "description of the incident and details of medical and mental health treatment is unconscionable and will bring the reporting of sexual violence and assault in the military to a standstill."

Meanwhile, the Pentagon has developed new policies for the awareness and prevention of sexual abuse in the military, with increased training and education as well as more stringent reporting and accountability.

Minitrez said the Army understands that this is a sensitive topic. Including some identifying information is necessary, he said, to ensure accurate data collection and to help determine whether victim advocacy programs as well as medical and investigative services are working.

In their letter to Harvey, the lawmakers said they were particularly concerned about exemption to the program that could allow an assailant with a higher rank or security clearance to have his or her connection to the assault excluded from the database.

Instead of introducing the new system, the Congress members said, the Pentagon should complete a long-overdue crime reporting database that would provide a wide variety of data but not include personal identifying information.

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

© 2005 The Washington Post Company