Page 2 of 2   <      

Stem Cell Research Advocates in Md. Optimistic

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

In an interview, Robey (D) said he "totally supports" the stem cell legislation, a stance that he believes is in step with the legislative district. Schrader did not return a call seeking comment.

Another target of advocates is John A. Giannetti Jr. (D-Prince George's), among the half-dozen or so Democrats who were prepared to join the Republican-led filibuster last session.

Giannetti, whose district includes College Park, faces a possible primary challenge from James C. Rosapepe, a former delegate and member of the University System of Maryland Board of Regents. Giannetti did not return phone calls, and Rosapepe declined to comment.

"I believe there's going to be pressure on some of these senators to represent their districts," Johnson said.

Nancy Fortier, associate director of the Maryland Catholic Conference, said she, however, has no reason to believe any of the senators who were prepared to join the filibuster have wavered. Her organization staunchly opposed the legislation last session.

Fortier said that recent advances in research on stem cells derived from sources other than embryos should also give lawmakers pause.

"It just seems crazy to pursue the thing that has so much ethical baggage," Fortier said.

Her organization has directed much of its recent lobbying at Ehrlich, a wild card in the upcoming debate.

"We need to convince him to oppose legislation that will fund unethical research," reads an "action alert" on the group's Web site.

Just days before the last session ended, Ehrlich said during a radio interview that he supports embryonic stem cell research. But an aide cautioned that Ehrlich did not necessarily support the bill under consideration.

Aides say Ehrlich is likely to include money for university research facilities in his upcoming capital budget. That prospect is one of "a number of options with regard to stem cell research that the governor is reviewing," spokeswoman Shareese DeLeaver said.

But stem cell advocates say bricks and mortar are not enough. At least nine other states have taken steps to fund stem cell research since Bush announced restrictions on federally backed research in 2001. Maryland has recently lost some high-profile researchers to other states.

"Funding facilities without the research expenditure is like a shiny new car without an engine," said House Speaker Michael E. Busch (D-Anne Arundel), who predicted that a stem cell bill would pass by a wide margin in his chamber, as it did last session.

That would again focus attention on the Senate, where Paula C. Hollinger (D-Baltimore County) has said it will be the first bill addressed by the health committee she chairs.

Bill supporters say they are willing to make compromises to pick up the final votes needed to head off another filibuster. Sen. Ulysses Currie (D-Prince George's), chairman of the Budget and Taxation Committee, said it is possible that the bill could be more palatable if it called for less funding.

Legislative leaders have also floated the idea of putting the issue before voters on the November ballot.

Miller said that is not his preferred route. "But if people feel like the issue is so important to the state that there should be a referendum, I don't have a problem with that," he said.


<       2


© 2005 The Washington Post Company