Republicans Are Split on the Meaning of Kilgore's Loss
Virginia GOP Chairman Kate Obenshain Griffin is telling party faithful that Jerry W. Kilgore lost last month's governor's race because he wasn't conservative enough, but many state Republicans disagree with her.
(By Steve Helber -- Associated Press)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Thursday, December 8, 2005
For the losers, elections are about lessons.
On Nov. 9, Virginia's Republican Party began thinking about the next legislative election, in 2007, and governor's race, in 2009. The party faithful who gathered at the Homestead resort last weekend were eager to draw the right lessons from Jerry W. Kilgore's loss to Lt. Gov. Timothy M. Kaine (D) this year.
It is still early, but it appears that some in the party leadership are coalescing around the following lesson: Kilgore wasn't conservative enough for Virginia's electorate.
That message comes straight from the top -- party Chairman Kate Obenshain Griffin . In a speech Saturday, she exhorted Republicans to keep the faith. "The answer to maintaining our majority is not found in the analysis of liberal critics and media elite who argue that we must abandon the very principles that brought us to a governing majority," she said.
The lesson is also coming from the bottom: the party's true-blue foot soldiers, bloggers and activists who had vocally urged Kilgore to be more doctrinaire about taxes, abortion, guns and gays.
In a column published three weeks before the election, Phillip Rodokanakis , the head of an anti-tax group called the Virginia Club for Growth, attacked Kilgore for playing to the middle.
"The Kilgore camp fears that their candidate could be labeled an extremist if he espoused some of the positions advocated by these groups," Rodokanakis wrote. "Yet by failing to take a stand either for or against these positions, Kilgore has infuriated the entire membership of these organizations -- a membership that is very active in grass-roots politics."
The "not conservative enough" crowd points to the victories of the party's other two candidates, Lt. Gov.-elect William T. "Bill" Bolling and Attorney General-elect Robert F. McDonnell , as proof that candidates who run as conservatives can win.
"We stand for promises made and promises kept," former governor James S. Gilmore (R) said at the Homestead. "We will be doomed to minority status if we do not."
Virginia's Republican Party has been nursing deep divisions since 2001, when Gilmore's insistence on cutting the car tax crashed headfirst into the desire for investment among leading Republican senators.
Those divisions were ripped even further apart in 2004, when the two wings of the party openly revolted against each other over Democratic Gov. Mark R. Warner's proposed tax increases.
In the wake of Kilgore's loss and the defeat of several arch-conservative legislative candidates last month, the pro-investment wing of the Republican Party is offering a different lesson for the future.


![[The Presidential Field]](http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2007/09/17/GR2007091700670.gif)




