'Multi-Sector' Workforce Has Government Seeking Answers
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
It's no secret that the government turns to contractors, state and local governments, nonprofit organizations and others to deliver services and programs to citizens.
And it's no secret that the government sometimes has trouble managing its relationships with these third parties.
In recent months, the Education Department has been criticized for hiring a conservative commentator to push favorable reporting on the president's No Child Left Behind initiative. The Pentagon has been roiled by improper contracting practices in the purchase of products and services for the war in Iraq and has faced allegations of contractor abuse at Abu Ghraib prison.
There's even been in-house scandal -- a former Air Force acquisition official went to jail for playing favorites in procurement decisions, and a former Office of Management and Budget procurement policy chief has been arrested in connection with a probe into the dealings of a Washington lobbyist.
It's also no secret that contracting out of federal work will continue and probably grow in coming decades. Congress, for instance, has given the green light to the Internal Revenue Service to use private collection companies to track down deadbeat taxpayers. The companies will get to keep a share of the revenue they bring in.
Inside the government, the White House has rubbed numerous federal employees the wrong way with its push for competitive sourcing -- cost-comparison studies to see whether federal jobs can be turned over to the private sector. Unions have fought the effort, and Congress has placed some restraints on the initiative in appropriations bills.
Without taking sides or passing judgment on the use of third parties, the National Academy of Public Administration, a congressionally chartered think tank, has launched a project to help federal agencies examine how they deal with what the academy calls "the multi-sector workforce."
The idea is "to really help the government rethink what it's all about," said C. Morgan Kinghorn , the academy's president.
Hannah Sistare , director of a management consortium at the academy, said: "We have moved to whole new ways of hiring and managing the performance of government work without thinking about what is the best way to do it."
A report prepared by the academy draws from research by Lester M. Salamon , Paul C. Light , Dan Guttman and other academy fellows. The government, in 2002, supported 5.16 million jobs through contracts and 2.8 million jobs through grants, the report said. Government employees that year included 1.8 million civil servants, 1.45 million uniformed military personnel and 875,000 postal workers.
Dealing with a multi-sector workforce involves an array of regulatory, personnel and managerial issues, with accountability for program failures and successes high on the list, said Alethea Long-Green , human resources director for government studies at the academy.
Federal managers, she said, "are ultimately accountable for what's done, how it's done and to whom it's done."


