Page 2 of 2   <      

BlackBerry Users Can Relax: NTP Won't Shut You Down

NTP Inc. could win less money from BlackBerry maker Research in Motion Ltd. should an injunction halt service.
NTP Inc. could win less money from BlackBerry maker Research in Motion Ltd. should an injunction halt service. (By Richard Drew -- Associated Press)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Its goal is to wring as much money as possible out of RIM. It's not going to collect any more money by getting an injunction to shut down the service and would probably get less.

"An injunction is crazy," Creasman said.

"To me, it wouldn't make a lot of sense," Miro said.

Still, the legal proceedings have now reached the "pay or die" stage.

Miro and Creasman agree with NTP lawyer Wallace on what could happen next.

If RIM won't agree to pay royalties, NTP can go to court and ask for an injunction prohibiting RIM from using NTP's patented technology, which could mean shutting down BlackBerry service in the entire United States.

"They stole our technology. They refuse to take a license," Wallace said. "Why shouldn't we shut them down? We have a right to."

Yes, he does, the two other lawyers agreed. "I've not seen a case in which the plaintiff [NTP in this case] prevailed and sought an injunction and was turned down," Miro said.

RIM's lawyers aren't talking. The Canadian company and its lawyers have played hardball all along and have done little to discourage people from thinking they could lose their BlackBerrys if NTP wins the case. It has said that it developed a "workaround" that would keep the devices running without using the disputed patent, but it has provided no details and some tech experts are skeptical that it could be done.

The bye-bye-BlackBerry threat is a variation on what has long been known in Washington as the "shut down the Washington Monument" ploy.

You know how this gambit works. Congress gets into a stalemate over the budget and some bureaucrat warns solemnly, "Well, if we don't get the money, we're going to have to close the Washington Monument to tourists." Or cut the high school football team. Or drain the swimming pools. Or whatever painfully symbolic sacrifice you can come up with.

In the end, BlackBerrys aren't likely to be shut down, but all the fear and trembling hasn't helped RIM's stock.

The people who have the most at stake in how the BlackBerry brawl ends are the stockholders of Research in Motion -- and the speculators who have bet against BlackBerry by shorting RIM stock.

The short sellers -- who borrow shares and then sell them, betting that they can buy them back later at a lower price -- have made good money so far. Though BlackBerry sales have grown steadily, RIM stock is falling. It peaked at around $93 a share in October of last year and closed Friday at $64.13.

That's a $5 billion loss in market value -- substantially more than is at stake in the patent case.

National Bank Financial Ltd., a Toronto investment firm, estimated that settling the dispute would cost RIM about $1 billion. It's a price the firm could easily afford, NBF notes, because RIM has $2 billion in cash.

So why not simply settle?

Perhaps it's a matter of pride. RIM is Canada's best-known high-tech company, the north-of-the-border equivalent of Microsoft or Google. It would be a real comedown for the Canadians to admit that their revolutionary product is based on U.S.-owned technology.

Jerry Knight's e-mail isknightj@washpost.com.


<       2


© 2005 The Washington Post Company