By Amy Joyce
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, December 18, 2005
Martha Mensch works three days a week as the director of strategic development in the finance department at Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.
And so does Andrea Pesta.
After years of struggling with trying to be mother and executive, hoping to hang on to a career in finance while also trying to hang on to sanity, Mensch and Pesta heard a suggestion from their boss that it was time for them to put their heads and lives together and share one job at the firm. At that time, it was an idea that had never been tried before at Booz, particularly at such a high level of the company.
When their boss suggested the arrangement to Mensch more than a decade ago, he asked her to think about it, think about what it might be like to partner with Pesta (they barely knew each other) and then get back to him. As she was walking out of his office, she asked if it was too early to give him her decision.
Pesta and Mensch were on the first edges of job sharing. They are also among the few who have succeeded at a job share at such a high level in an organization. But it has worked. The two have shared four jobs now and have even been promoted together. The concept of job sharing is still not incredibly popular with most companies. But as workers attempt to come up with alternatives to an 80-hour workweek, and as baby boomer retirements threaten companies with a major loss of workers, the cliche "work-life balance" is getting a second look. Postings asking for a job-share partner are becoming more common on company bulletin boards, among listings on job Web sites and, naturally, at working women's organizations.
"If you're able to keep on the professional track, and you're coming in three days a week, you're able to really make a contribution but you're not consumed by the job," said Pat Katepoo, director of WorkOptions.com, a group that helps employees come up with alternative work schedules and situations.
But the idea of two brains for one job is still a foreign concept to many employers and employees.
According to the Society for Human Resource Management's 2005 benefits survey, just 19 percent of companies allow some sort of job-sharing program. That compares with 33 percent of companies that offer a compressed workweek, 56 percent that provide flex time and 37 percent that allow telecommuting.
When the job-share proposal first came up, Mensch, now 46, and Pesta, 43, who work for the consulting company in Parsippany, N.J., had both hit a strange point in their careers. They were working many more hours than they were comfortable with, but they were professionally successful and wanted to remain that way.
Mensch had been hired barely a year before the new arrangement as a part-time manager of consolidations. She really wanted the job, but only on the condition that she have a couple of days per week at home with her two small children.
Although she had two workdays "off," she still worked almost as many hours as a full-timer. "I knew the position had always been a full-time job that was probably 50 hours or so," Mensch said. "So to hear I was given that opportunity on a part-time basis, I should have thought twice."
On her days off, she was always available. During her busy season, she went back to full time for three months.
Pesta, meanwhile, approached her manager while she was on maternity leave, to try her job -- manager of Booz's treasury area -- on a part-time basis. "I was all excited. But those three days started to be long days. And my days off were more and more infringed upon by calls from the office, or by my own doing," she said.
While both women were separately trying to figure out what to do about their full-time job squeezed into supposedly part-time weeks, their boss, Doug Swenson, and a human resources representative came up with the job-share solution.
"We had two highly skilled finance professionals who were capable of contributing exceptional value and continuing their professional development. We did not, however, have two part-time roles that would match their capabilities and potential," said Swenson, now the chief financial officer. "If Andrea and Martha could make it work, everyone would win. They would be able to maintain the work-life balance and be in roles best matching their capabilities and potential. The firm would benefit from continuing to receive the value added from two very skilled professionals."
They gave the women the choice of sharing Pesta's job or Mensch's. The women decided to take Pesta's treasury position because it was a job and direction in which they were both interested.
"I hardly knew her," said Pesta, who had already worked at the firm for eight years. "But somehow that didn't overly concern me. Certainly you have to think of the person and how it would work. I just assumed we would work it out because we wanted it for the same reason."
Today, just as they have since 1993, the women share a workweek. They share an e-mail address and an office. They share one day each week. They share a rsum.
They share blame and accolades. And that, they say, is the only way to make a job share work.
There can't be jealousy or any feelings of competition. One must want for her partner exactly what she wants for herself.
The key elements to the partnership are "all things necessary in a successful marriage, as well. It's really about the relationship and sharing common goals. You really have to want this to work. . . . It's very easy if you're motivated differently to sabotage the relationship," Mensch said. "We always emphasize that what's key in this relationship, which we compare to a marriage, is collaboration and compromise."
Join Amy from 11 a.m. to noon Tuesday at washingtonpost.com to discuss your life at work. You can e-mail her at firstname.lastname@example.org with your column ideas.