Ballet's Battle, Children's Loss
|
TOOLBOX
   Resize
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Who's Blogging  |
I read with interest and some disbelief about the controversy between the Washington Ballet's board of directors and the union that represents the company's dancers ["Washington Ballet Cancels 'Nutcracker' Run," front page, Dec. 17]. Both sides seemed to have disregarded the effect of their acts on the children who were in the production.
About 275 children, including my daughter, attended rehearsal after rehearsal, and they performed brilliantly in Septime Webre's shimmering "Nutcracker." What rights did these young performers have when the decision was made to force a confrontation and to cancel the production?
Many "Nutcracker" ticket holders come to watch a "Little Clown," a soldier's precision march, a butterfly or a mushroom. Members of my family were flying in from Russia, Japan and other parts of the United States to attend a performance.
Unfortunately, hundreds of families such as ours were affected by the poor timing of this confrontation between the union and the ballet company's board. Is it really right that only a few people held hundreds of young performers hostage?
KATHLEEN CRANE
Falls Church
