Page 2 of 2   <      

Dancers, Ballet Out of Step in Pas de Deux

On strike or locked out? Washington Ballet dancers, embroiled in a labor dispute, picketed Warner Theatre last week.
On strike or locked out? Washington Ballet dancers, embroiled in a labor dispute, picketed Warner Theatre last week. (By Preston Keres -- The Washington Post)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Some money was saved by shutting down, however. AGMA reports that dancers lost about $35,000 in pay. Kallas says the musicians and stagehands both lost more. She estimates that the ballet's total savings on salaries are more than $180,000.

The struggle has created a lot of bad feelings. Ticket holders have been left wondering how to make it up to disappointed children who were looking forward to the holiday performances. Sad stories abound of relatives traveling great distances -- even flying in from overseas -- to see beloved little ones onstage with the pros, only to have their expectations dashed.

But in the long term, observers say, the biggest losers may be the dancers themselves. They have already lost paychecks, although management has said they will be paid for 12 hours of rehearsal time last week. AGMA reports that calls have been coming in from around the country from people seeking to donate to the relief fund it has set up in its New York headquarters for the dancers. The union, which has not yet been collecting dues from the dancers because it has no contract, does not have a strike fund.

For the past month and a half, the dancers have been trying to reach an agreement with management. It would be the first union contract in Washington Ballet's decades-long history. Both sides say this initial contract is hugely important, as it will serve as a blueprint for years to come. Last week, in hopes of speeding the process, the dancers tried to force a decision on an "interim" three-year agreement that would have guaranteed them concessions on some safety and job-security measures. The move backfired when management refused the dancers' demands and put forth its own agreement. When the dancers rejected that, management closed down the show.

What happens now?

The dancers have only one card to play to reach an agreement, according to Gregory Drone, union representative for the Kennedy Center Opera House Orchestra. Drone says the ballet fiasco reminds him of the 1991 labor dispute between the orchestra and the Washington Opera. The issues were similar, said Drone: minimum size of the orchestra and hours per week of rehearsal. To make their points clear, the musicians met with a few key board members.

"We educated them about what this was all about," Drone said. "We made it clear that what we were asking for was not unreasonable. . . . Then the board members took control of the negotiations and we settled with them."

Ultimately, he said, what had been a stressful and depressing situation resulted in a rise in stature for the opera. It "led to a lot of soul-searching among the board members about what kind of company they're going to have," Drone said. "Instead of trying to squeeze everybody to do everything with the least resources, there was a feeling of 'We're going to go first class.' "

Drone says the Washington Ballet is at a similar crossroads. "Some board members have to make a decision: Are they going to stand by and watch the company be destroyed by this or are they going to intervene and save the company and go forward?"

George Washington University labor law professor Charles Craver says the collective bargaining process is essentially a power struggle: "Most employers in this country do not like sharing power. And this is a business of people who are not used to being told anything by the people who work for them." An employer can easily drag out the process, "patiently going through the motions until [the union] is gone." Nothing in the National Labor Relations Act says the parties have to reach an agreement, Craver said. If bargaining continues to drag on without a resolution, the union may have to "cave in and accept the terms."

Giving up is not an option, says AGMA Executive Director Alan Gordon. "I assume that after a period of time the dancers will get fed up and say if the company wants to destroy their lives, they'll destroy the company," he said. "That's the leverage."

Torres has a personal stake in the crucial issues, particularly in the area of workplace safety. Injured during preparations for last year's "Nutcracker," Torres underwent hip surgery in February. An agreement with the dancers that protects them from overwork will only improve the Washington Ballet's reputation, he said.

"What we want is to create a professional company that has high standards," said Torres, "that can compare to any well-known company in the United States, just on a smaller budget scale. Why would you not want to do that? Knowing what is right and not doing it is avoiding the evolution of the organization."

Though the dancers and management have had little recent success communicating, they would seem to be in agreement on wanting to move beyond the current impasse. Said the ballet's Palmquist: "I hope that once we are past this episode that we can look back and say that it was really horrible that [the cancellation] happened, but we are moving on together."


<       2


© 2005 The Washington Post Company