Page 2 of 2   <      

Corralling Domestic Intelligence

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

"The reporting of incidents, who heard what and how it was reported, was unbelievably diverse and would reach the White House by many different paths, many idiosyncratic," Falkenrath said. He said it was "logical" that the NCTC now "should set standards for collecting that information."

Talon is not the only system that contains unverified SARs.

The FBI has a classified system called Guardian that carries urgent, initial reports about suspicious acts, according to one bureau official.

He described it as an automated database used "to track and monitor terrorism threats and suspicious activity from the initial reporting to its final resolution." One example, he said, involved individuals seen taking pictures of a nuclear power plant who jumped in their car when approached for identification.

"In all cases it is up to the reporting agent to follow up on suspicious activities and if a report clears it up, it is taken out of the database," the official said. "There has to be a resolution," which Pentagon officials acknowledged did not happen with Talon reports.

The State Department has a system called the Security Incident Management and Analysis System, which carries reports of suspicious activities from overseas embassies and other diplomatic facilities.

And the Treasury Department has a program for filing SARs related to unusual transfers of funds, which has focused primarily on terrorism threats since 2001.

In June 2004, the acting Treasury inspector general, Dennis S. Schindel, told a House committee that "the SAR database sometimes lacked critical information or included inaccurate data."


<       2


© 2006 The Washington Post Company