Fed Page   |   E-Mail Newsletter  Fed Insider E-Mail   |    RSS   |   Column Archive

Postal Service Goes on Offensive in Fight With Senators Over System to Set Mail Rates

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Stephen Barr
Thursday, January 26, 2006

The U.S. Postal Service headquarters launched a blitz yesterday to block a Senate bill, contending that the legislation, in combination with White House demands, could trigger a 20 percent increase in stamp prices in the near future.

The bill's sponsors, Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Thomas R. Carper (D-Del.), said they were "outraged that the Postal Service would mislead senators." In a statement, they said, "Nothing in the bill would lead to rate increases."

Government agencies rarely risk incurring the wrath of committee chairmen who oversee their operations, as is the case with Collins. As head of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, she has made the overhaul of postal operations one of her priorities.

Her bill would create a system of setting mail rates that she believes would give the post office greater pricing flexibility and would prevent it from raising rates each year in excess of inflation as measured by the consumer price index.

The Postal Service faces a bleak future if e-mail and Internet services continue to expand and erode first-class mail volume. Although the post office has stabilized its finances in recent years, efforts continue to reduce labor costs and consolidate operations.

As the word spread this week that Collins planned to bring her bill to the Senate floor, postal officials distributed a letter from the postal Board of Governors reaffirming the board's objections to the proposed overhaul, the first in more than 30 years.

Yesterday, postal officials stepped up their effort to block the bill, contacting Senate staff members and providing each Senate office with a copy of the board's objections.

"We need meaningful reform, and this is not it," Tom Day , senior vice president for government relations, said in a telephone interview.

Senate leaders plan to bring the Collins bill to the floor for speedy approval, called unanimous consent, that does not require a roll-call vote. Postal lobbyists were on the hunt for a senator who would object to the maneuver and put a hold on the bill.

The House has approved a postal overhaul, and once the Senate clears the Collins bill, it will go to a House-Senate committee that will reconcile differences between the two versions. The White House has announced opposition to any compromise that would increase the federal deficit.

Postal officials fear that a compromise bill could leave it on the hook for two major financial obligations and would allow postal regulators to intrude on internal operations and override business decisions.

Day said mail rates could soar by as much as 20 percent if Congress and the White House agreed to extend a 2003 law that requires the post office to pay for military retirement benefits earned by employees before their postal careers, and if the post office also is ordered to prepay health benefits for employees in the Civil Service Retirement System. Such costs are usually covered by the Treasury Department, using taxpayer dollars.


CONTINUED     1        >


© 2006 The Washington Post Company