Page 4 of 4   <      

Q& A: Pervez Musharraf, President of Pakistan

Terrorism hits home: A Pakistani soldier guards the spot where two suicide bombers rammed President Pervez Musharraf's motorcade on Dec. 25, 2003, the second assassination attempt in 11 days. Musharraf's car was damaged but he was unhurt. Sixteen people were killed.
Terrorism hits home: A Pakistani soldier guards the spot where two suicide bombers rammed President Pervez Musharraf's motorcade on Dec. 25, 2003, the second assassination attempt in 11 days. Musharraf's car was damaged but he was unhurt. Sixteen people were killed. (Associated Press)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Because they don't know the environment. . . . There are very high mountains, between 10,000 and 15,000 feet, no communication infrastructure, and some people [are] abetting [them].

Do you think President Bush is going about the war on terrorism the right way? Do you think the U.S. understands the Muslim world?

Certainly there are a lot of loopholes in the West's understanding of the Muslim world. . . . Pakistan is against terrorism and extremism in its own interest, not because of the United States or the world.

Do you think President Bush has the right goal -- to eliminate al Qaeda?

The goal is correct, but it's limited because military action is not an end in itself. One must remember this. Military action buys you time to utilize all other instruments to get to the core issues which are spawning terrorism. If we cannot see beyond terrorism, we will never succeed. . . . Having bought this time -- what is the overall strategy?

We must deal with extremism. . . . Extremism spawns terrorism. Is the United States thinking of addressing extremism? We don't even understand what extremism is. We always confuse terrorism and extremism. Terrorism is one thing, extremism is another. Each needs a totally different strategy.

What is that strategy?

I have given the idea of enlightened moderation where the Islamic world combines to reject terrorism and extremism and goes on the social and economic path. . . . Every Muslim country should see what its environment is and act accordingly. We have adopted a strategy against extremism: (1) All these banned organizations: Don't let them reemerge, get hold of all their leaders. We are doing that. (2) Misuse of loudspeakers in mosques to spread hatred and militancy: Stop it. We are doing that. (3) Publications and hate material inciting people to militancy: Ban it, get hold of printers, publishers, distributors. We are doing that. (4) Syllabus and curriculum in our schools which have led to sectarian disharmony [and] religious misunderstanding: Redo the syllabus where the real essence of Islam -- which deals more with responsibilities to the nation and the family -- is taught. (5) Reform the madrassas and mainstream the students.

We are the only country in the world that has adopted a strategy on how to combat terrorism and extremism.

The U.S. has failed to understand the need to use more than military might?

The military is not the ultimate answer -- you can kill people, [but] you are not going to achieve anything. People think "Get Osama bin Laden and Zawahiri." You get Osama and Zawahiri, okay, you kill them tomorrow, I can assure you [that] you will have achieved nothing. Let it be very clear.

Because the real problems won't have been addressed?

Of course. For heaven's sake, let's not be shortsighted. These two people mean nothing. Do you think the man sitting in these inaccessible mountains is commanding what to do in Spain and London? You are sadly mistaken. . . . There is no milk and honey flowing after you get these two people.


<             4


© 2006 The Washington Post Company