Good News, Bad News About Part D
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Harold Meyerson ["Bush the Incompetent," op-ed, Jan. 25] made much of the difficulties that have arisen during the startup of the Medicare prescription drug benefit program. Yet he said nothing of the good the program is doing for millions of seniors and people with disabilities who are finally getting help paying for their medicines. Nor did he give President Bush credit for getting the prescription drug benefit passed -- something that had been debated for 10 years.
The addition of drug coverage is the biggest change to the Medicare program in 40 years, and any time you make a big change in a small time, unanticipated problems will arise. When Medicare was rolled out in the 1960s, it had problems and plenty of criticism.
The measure of the drug benefit's success is not whether the program is perfect on its first day but whether we solve the problems quickly. We are doing so, and the system is improving every day. The progress is real, and so are the benefits.
MIKE LEAVITT
Secretary
Department of Health and Human Services
Washington
ยท


