| Page 2 of 3 < > |
Good News, Bad News About Part D
|
TOOLBOX
   Resize
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Who's Blogging  |
I was offended by a Jan. 14 front-page story that said that one problem with the Medicare Part D prescription drug program is poorly trained pharmacists. As a pharmacist, I want to say that we were dealt a lemon with this program. It is confusing for those who are to benefit, and it was turned over to companies that have tried to run it on the cheap.
Many pharmacists spent time at seminars on this program or went online to receive training. Others, like me, bought material to train staff and educate the public.
But this program was poorly implemented from the beginning. The Bush administration talks about "faith-based initiatives," but churches were not even contacted. As a pastor, I told my congregation what to expect, and I've made presentations to everyone who has asked for my help in central and eastern Virginia.
Pharmacists are trying to make this plan work even though it takes money out of their pockets. The plan is costing patients and the states more, too.
The blame should be placed where it really belongs: on insurance companies and their partners who can manipulate drug prices.
LEONARD L. EDLOE
Susan, Va.
The writer is a pharmacist and pastor of Antioch Baptist Church.
ยท
