Medical Privacy Isn't Just A Privilege, It's a Right
|
TOOLBOX
   Resize
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Who's Blogging  |
Phillip Longman's proposal to send professional voyeurs into medical records would be a disaster for patients, the practice of medicine and the American way of life ["From Typhoid Mary to Diabetic Debbie," op-ed, Feb. 15].
Medical records are full of privileged information, private details shared in a trusting relationship. National surveys consistently show strong public support for medical privacy. To dismiss privacy as a privilege is to ignore the needs of patients and the rights of citizens.
In Mr. Longman's view, every person should be "watched" through his or her medical record. Such intrusions would not only reduce the accuracy of data in the medical record -- wreaking havoc on research -- but also would cost more than a pretty penny to undo the resulting damage to the public's and patients' trust.
TWILA BRASE
President
Citizens' Council on Health Care
St. Paul, Minn.
