Accused Developer To Pay $276,750

Montgomery Agrees To Absolve Builder

Ryan Homes is selling the 59 units in Seaton Square in Montgomery County's White Oak neighborhood for as much as $600,000 each. A preliminary county review showed that the homes were too tall and too close to rear neighbors. (By Robert A. Reeder -- The Washington Post)

Faced with a steep fine for violating Montgomery County regulations, one of the region's largest home builders found a way to keep its record clean: Pay more.

Ryan Homes agreed to pay $276,750 to avoid admitting wrongdoing for building townhouses higher than the county allows in Silver Spring. The company had originally faced a $92,250 penalty and citation.

The chairman of the county Planning Board, Derick P. Berlage, hailed the outcome as one of the largest fines in its history. But critics such as Jim Humphrey of the Montgomery County Civic Federation said the deal is symptomatic of how development problems often are handled: Those with money can buy their way out of trouble.

Ryan Homes is selling townhouses in the 59-unit Seaton Square development in Silver Spring's White Oak section for as much as $600,000, according to real estate data.

"The Planning Board got bullied," said Humphrey, who sat through Thursday's board meeting, which turned into a lengthy bargaining session that ended about 11:30 p.m. in a nearly deserted Silver Spring auditorium.

"We believe violations did occur and are exploring legal options to challenge the board's decision," Humphrey said.

Ryan Homes brought at least three top company officials and three prominent county development lawyers to plead its case. The officials said that the company was eager to keep doing business in Montgomery and that they were worried about their firm's reputation.

Their first offer -- to pay $92,250 and admit no wrongdoing -- was rejected quickly by the five-member Planning Board, as was a second offer to double the money. After a few hours and several hallway discussions between company officials and their attorneys, the third offer came: $276,750. The Planning Board approved it, 4 to 1, agreeing to avoid citing the company for violations.

"We want to apologize for being here. We take a great deal of pride in our business in Montgomery County and look forward to many more years of being here," said Don Ashbaugh, a local president of the national company.

In November, county officials halted work at Seaton Square after a preliminary review showed that the homes were too tall and too close to rear neighbors and that the developer had failed to create paths and play areas on time. County officials subsequently found only height violations.

Seaton Square is one of several developments to face increased county scrutiny in the wake of last year's discovery of construction irregularities at the 1,300-home Clarksburg Town Center in northern Montgomery, where homes were found to have been built too tall and too close to neighbors and the street.

As the Clarksburg controversy unfolded, county officials agreed last year to review other recently approved developments -- including Seaton Square -- after activists and some members of the County Council said they feared that similar irregularities might exist elsewhere.