Parsing Kaine: Did He Mean 'No New Taxes'?

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Michael D. Shear
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, March 2, 2006

Is Virginia Gov. Timothy M. Kaine (D) getting off easy when it comes to his decision to raise taxes despite a campaign promise not to?

That depends on what, exactly, you think he promised.

Kaine's predecessor, Mark R. Warner (D), was clear as crystal during his own campaign in 2001. He looked into the camera and said: "Let me set the record straight: I will not raise taxes." He later did just that, explaining that the state's financial situation was much worse than he was led to believe.

Kaine's history of tax-related promises is not so clear.

Early in his campaign, Kaine said he would not seek new revenue for transportation -- code for a tax increase -- unless the state's Transportation Trust Fund was locked up tight. He vowed to push for a constitutional amendment to keep lawmakers from dipping into the fund for reasons unrelated to roads.

Here he was on Nov. 17, 2004, a year before the election:

"So long as we have a transportation fund with a hole in it, I don't think it's right," he told reporters after a speech to the Virginia Chamber of Commerce. "The people sent us a very strong message in 2002 [when voters rejected a tax increase for transportation]. Unless we show them we listened to what they said, we can't very well go back and ask them for more money."

That's pretty clear, right? No tax increases without a constitutional amendment. And because a constitutional amendment takes a minimum of three years, a tax increase would seem to have been put off until at least 2009.

But on Feb. 27, 2005, he added this: "There would have to be absolute certainty about it. Could something make me feel certain short of the voters approving the change in a referendum? Maybe."

In that interview, I pressed Kaine to explain how he might feel "certain" and whether the ambiguity opened the door to the possibility of a tax increase.

Being in the beginning stages of his campaign against former attorney general Jerry W. Kilgore (R), Kaine was taking great pains to explain why a tax increase, especially on gas, was not a likelihood if he were elected governor.

"I'm very clear on this," he said. "I'm not going to ask people for any more revenue when there's no guarantee that the revenue will go to transportation."


CONTINUED     1        >


More from Virginia

[The Presidential Field]

Blog: Virginia Politics

Here's a place to help you keep up with Virginia's overcaffeinated political culture.

Election Coverage

Election Coverage

Find out who is on the ballot in the next Virginia election.

© 2006 The Washington Post Company