Media Notes Archive   |   Live Q&As   |   RSS Feeds RSS   |  E-mail Kurtz  |  Style Section
Page 2 of 2   <      

On Iraq, Plenty of Scores to Settle Even If the Dust Hasn't

Jabs from the left came from Paul Krugman, top, and David Corn; from the right, even William Buckley, below, said
Jabs from the left came from Paul Krugman, top, and David Corn; from the right, even William Buckley, below, said "One can't doubt that the American objective in Iraq has failed." (By William Thomas Cain For The Washington Post)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Lowry responded by saying he didn't remember using that phrase, but that "I do remember complaining that in all our debates David had never once expressed the slightest pleasure at Saddam's ouster or the Iraqi elections. . . . For the record: I don't think David is an enemy of democracy, just a partisan blinded by Bush hatred. And I see no connection between the crowd-pleasing bile he sometimes spews at our debates, and Buckley's prudential doubts about nation-building in Iraq."

It would be easy to dismiss all the sniping as pundits behaving badly. After all, the usual drill is for liberals to declare some administration policy a failure (the economy, Hurricane Katrina, the Medicare drug program) and for conservatives to insist that things are going much better than the Bush-bashers and left-leaning press would have you believe. There were exceptions to this pattern -- many conservatives savaged the Harriet Miers nomination and the Dubai ports deal -- but their rarity made them especially newsworthy.

As Bush continues to flounder in the polls, more on the right are breaking ranks. Bruce Bartlett, who was dropped by a free-market think tank over his new book "Impostor: How George W. Bush Bankrupted America and Betrayed the Reagan Legacy," recently called the administration "unconscionable," "vindictive" and "inept."

Peggy Noonan writes that she would not have voted for Bush had she known he was going to turn into a big-spending Lyndon Johnson. Jonah Goldberg writes that "most conservatives never really understood what compassionate conservatism was, beyond a convenient marketing slogan," and the "reality" is "that there was nothing behind the curtain."

Not everyone is jumping ship. Fred Barnes, executive editor of the Weekly Standard, who remains a strong Bush supporter, writes that "the mainstream media likes nothing more than to play up conservatives who attack other conservatives."

Maybe so. But the war is the overriding issue of the Bush presidency, and when conservative commentators begin shifting their stance on whether the conflict has been mishandled, it's hardly surprising that their liberal counterparts are going to pile on. Iraq, like Vietnam, may well stir passions for a generation, and those in the opinion business will not be able to escape the question: Which side were you on?

Color Blindness

"The cover photograph in The Times Magazine on Sunday rendered colors incorrectly for the jacket, shirt and tie worn by Mark Warner, the former Virginia governor who is a possible candidate for the presidency. The jacket was charcoal, not maroon; the shirt was light blue, not pink; the tie was dark blue with stripes, not maroon. . . . The film that was used can cause colors to shift, and the processing altered them further; the change escaped notice because of a misunderstanding by the editors." -- Wednesday's New York Times.

Huffy Over Huffington

It all depends on the meaning of the word blog.

George Clooney is mighty steamed at Arianna Huffington for stitching together comments from a couple of his interviews and running them as a posting on her Web site. Clooney says the Huffington Post created the false impression that he wrote the short essay about being a proud liberal.

The Oscar-winning actor told the New York Daily News he feels "abused" and that Huffington had warned him that his griping would be "bad for my career. . . . I'm not going to be threatened by Arianna Huffington!"

Huffington's blog response is that it was all "an honest misunderstanding" and she believed she had written permission from Clooney's PR person. "But any misunderstanding that occurred, occurred between Clooney and the publicist." Over the weekend, however, Huffington apologized for making a "big" mistake and said she will now make clear when blog postings are reprinted from elsewhere.

Veteran magazine editor Jeff Jarvis of BuzzMachine.com is siding with Clooney: "How Hollywood can this go: 'I'll have my person link to your person'? . . . Huffington was wrong to try to create a faked-up post under Clooney's name."

NPR's High Standards

"I was so micromanaged that they were telling me how to pronounce syllables of words." -- Bob Edwards on his former employer, National Public Radio, telling Newsweek he feels liberated at XM Satellite Radio.


<       2


© 2006 The Washington Post Company