Geico's Risk Criteria Challenged

Geico Chairman Tony Nicely, with gecko mascot, in Trenton in 2004. A N.J. competitor has joined with a consumer group in calling for a ban on using education in assessing risk.
Geico Chairman Tony Nicely, with gecko mascot, in Trenton in 2004. A N.J. competitor has joined with a consumer group in calling for a ban on using education in assessing risk. (By Curt Hudson -- Bloomberg News)

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Albert B. Crenshaw and Caroline E. Mayer
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, March 21, 2006

According to an internal Geico document, the auto insurer uses drivers' levels of education and occupations in setting insurance rates.

As a result, Consumer Federation of America argued, blue-collar workers with relatively low levels of education sometimes are charged almost twice as much as better-educated professionals, based on those criteria.

Geico said in a statement that it uses many factors in setting rates and that allegations that education and occupation are being used as the sole criterion are "absolutely untrue."

The document cited by the consumer group and a Geico competitor raises long-standing questions about which criteria insurance companies may use as proper gauges of risk and which improperly discriminate against poor people and minorities.

Insurers, consumer advocates, regulators and politicians have been struggling for years over such issues, including the use of credit scores in assessing risk. The use of credit scores is permissible in about 30 states but continues to be debated.

Yesterday, CFA called on insurance regulators to bar insurers from basing decisions on whether to sell insurance to someone and what rates to charge solely on the applicant's education and income, calling the practice "an underwriting sleight of hand" to avoid existing prohibitions on using race and other criteria.

"No single criterion is ever used to determine a customer's rate," Geico said in a statement late yesterday. "Persons of all educational levels and occupations are offered insurance at our best rate based on a variety of criteria. Income or race based criteria never has a role in underwriting or pricing. These allegations are patently false and intentionally divisive."

The consumer group was joined by New Jersey Citizens United Reciprocal Exchange, a nonprofit insurer and Geico competitor in that state. They based their call for regulatory action on an internal Geico document filed with regulators in New Jersey, which makes more documents public than other states. The document included a guide used by Geico's underwriters to decide which of the company's four subsidiary companies will insure an applicant and to determine what price an applicant will be offered.

The guide, in addition to listing factors such as driving history, age, mileage and vehicle type, includes a section dividing drivers into eight groups based on their education and occupation. Considered "more favorable" are professionals with college degrees and graduate students. "Least favorable" are "minimally skilled clerks, assistants, stock clerks and postal clerks," as well as long-haul drivers and "unskilled and semiskilled blue and gray collar workers."

"Educational attainment and occupation are directly linked to income, which cannot be used in determining insurance eligibility or rates because of its serious adverse impact on lower-income and minority consumers," said J. Robert Hunter, CFA's director of insurance and a former Texas insurance commissioner. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 89.4 percent of non-Hispanic whites 25 and older held a high school diploma in 2003. By comparison, 80 percent of blacks and 57 percent of Hispanics were high school graduates.

CFA said it sought rate quotations from Geico's Web site for motorists in locations in all 50 states and the District, entering data for drivers who were identical except for education and occupation. The experiment produced higher rates for the blue-collar driver in all but six locations (one of which was Fairfax County).

The differences ranged from 11.12 percent in Chicago to 124.72 percent in New Orleans.


CONTINUED     1        >

© 2006 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity