What Does the Censure Resolution Say?
Wednesday, March 22, 2006; Page A20
Why did the two main stories on the resolution by Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.) to censure the president focus exclusively on the politics and not the substance of the matter ["Feingold Pushes to Censure President; Some Democrats Wary of Resolution on Wiretapping," news story, March 14; "A Senate Maverick Acts to Force an Issue; Democrat Feingold's Motion to Censure the President Roils Both Parties," front page, March 15]?
How can readers judge the merit of the resolution without the facts and reasoning presented therein? The Post has an obligation to provide its readers with the specifics offered by Mr. Feingold on how the president's warrantless wiretaps are illegal.
JOAN JACOBS
Takoma Park
