What Does the Censure Resolution Say?
|
TOOLBOX
   Resize
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Who's Blogging  |
Why did the two main stories on the resolution by Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.) to censure the president focus exclusively on the politics and not the substance of the matter ["Feingold Pushes to Censure President; Some Democrats Wary of Resolution on Wiretapping," news story, March 14; "A Senate Maverick Acts to Force an Issue; Democrat Feingold's Motion to Censure the President Roils Both Parties," front page, March 15]?
How can readers judge the merit of the resolution without the facts and reasoning presented therein? The Post has an obligation to provide its readers with the specifics offered by Mr. Feingold on how the president's warrantless wiretaps are illegal.
JOAN JACOBS
Takoma Park
