Police Union To Keep Eye On Forum
Online Site Causing Montgomery Uproar
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Friday, March 31, 2006
The Montgomery County Fraternal Order of Police will monitor more closely an online message board that some officers have used to post disparaging messages about colleagues, immigrants and other community residents, a union spokesman said yesterday.
Union President Walter Bader is expected to announce at a news conference today that the union intends to block access to members who post racist, sexist or other inappropriate remarks, said Lanny Davis, a lawyer and public affairs expert hired to represent the union on what has become a controversial issue.
"The intention is to have more eyeballs on a real-time basis reviewing the postings," said Davis, who worked as special counsel for the Clinton White House in the late 1990s. "Until now, that hasn't been the case."
The disparaging messages were first reported last week by The Washington Post. The news conference will give Bader an opportunity to say "how sorry he is that these comments have gone unaddressed for so long," Davis said. "He and the FOP intend to fix the problem."
Several officers said they decided to speak to the press about the issue -- which some contend has taken a toll on department morale and possibly officer safety -- after months of receiving tepid responses about their concerns from union leaders and police supervisors.
Davis's statement comes as the union is gearing up for what promises to be a contentious round of contract negotiations. The command staff and the union will meet at the bargaining table in November for the first contract talks in three years and the first under the leadership of Police Chief J. Thomas Manger, who came from the nonunionized Fairfax County police.
The timing of the controversy was not lost on one officer who logged on to the message board the day the Post story ran.
"Just got back from the Public Safety Awards, Duncan came after us in his speech, mentioned the Post article," the officer wrote, referring to an annual Chamber of Commerce awards luncheon and County Executive Douglas M. Duncan (D). "A council member at our table said that this 'does not bode well for the union.' We negotiate our contract in November, let's hope this is a faint memory by then."
Davis said Bader will detail steps today that the union leadership wants members to agree to. He said the union has considered shutting down the board -- as Manger called on it to do -- but is inclined to find a different solution.
One key change is likely to involve giving officers user-specific passwords, which would make it easier to deny access to the message board. Many union members now share passwords. Among other things, union leaders say, that has allowed nonmembers to log on and possibly post messages.
Davis said Bader also will outline the types of messages that will not be allowed on the board.
"We're drawing a line at any racist, bigoted, sexist or inappropriate comment," Davis said.







