| Page 2 of 2 < |
The Civility Defense Force
At yesterday's colloquium honoring his pal David Abshire, left, Henry Kissinger remarked that his tact is "a truly artistic performance."
(By Lucian Perkins -- The Washington Post)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
"Suisse First Boston -- 1.5. ImClone -- 7. Rite Aid -- 8. Enron -- 10. Adelphia -- 20. Dynergy -- 24.3. WorldCom -- 25. The stock price of those firms? Perhaps the recent return on equity? No, those are the number of years that senior executives of those firms were sentenced to prison."
The skewering in that February speech spread to government, sports and education, for the missteps and moral lapses that Abshire called "the crisis of character in American life."
His footprint in Washington has been large for years, as has his reputation for getting people to do what he wanted, for "making you feel that he's doing you a tremendous favor for giving you that opportunity," his old friend, former secretary of state Henry Kissinger, joked during a colloquium at the Dirksen Senate office building yesterday in Abshire's honor. Abshire's tact, Kissinger said, is "a truly artistic performance."
Kissinger chairs the International Councillors Group at CSIS and has maintained an office at the K Street think tank for years. Kissinger is not listed on the civility committee. Nor was he listed last year. He's an institution unto himself anyway -- but that's a different story.
As for Abshire, last year his sixth book came out: "Saving the Reagan Presidency: Trust Is the Coin of the Realm." It chronicles how Reagan summoned Abshire, his ambassador to NATO, to serve as a special presidential counselor during the Iran-contra affair to help protect the presidency and act as a liaison with Congress.
The book also tells how Nixon summoned him, too. Abshire served as an assistant secretary of state for congressional relations during the Nixon years, a job that made him "a diplomat, a political scientist and even, at times, a psychiatrist," he writes. And when Watergate exploded, Nixon wanted Abshire's services at the White House to help fend off impeachment.
Trouble was, Abshire didn't trust his president.
In the book, he recounts telling his shocked stepfather-in-law: "I don't believe he's telling the truth." Nixon did not get him to the White House; Abshire tactfully declined.
In 2000, before that bitterly contested presidential election was decided, Abshire's presidential studies center published a collection of case studies titled "Triumphs and Tragedies of the Modern Presidency." And he was called upon to assist the Bush presidential transition.
But he won't offer an assessment of how the Bush team has applied the presidential lessons of the past. His center does not take positions on a sitting president.
All he will say is this: "Hubris is the enemy of civility."
His Committee to Unite a Divided America, co-chaired by Max M. Kampelman, the Cold War nuclear arms negotiator, identifies 12 national challenges he calls "the perfect storm," including the war on terror, nuclear proliferation, runaway health care costs, budget and trade deficits, and what it calls "an alarming decline in character-based leadership." The committee is pushing President Bush and Congress to promote consensus building, mobilize public support for the troops in Iraq and revitalize the United States' role as a global leader, among other things.
But he does not accept the notion that American politics are perhaps polarized beyond repair.
"We say civility doesn't mean we all agree," says Abshire. "Civility means we learn how to handle disagreements. . . . Sometimes out of those differences you get on higher ground."
During the interview, he moves to the edge of his chair, grabs a pamphlet from a pile on his table, and lowers his voice into a dramatic rendering of Benjamin Franklin at the Constitutional Convention of 1787, when the would-be signers were divided.
"On the whole, Sir I can not help expressing a Wish that every Member of the Convention, who may still have Objections to it, would, with me, on this Occasion doubt a little of his own Infallibility and, to make manifest our unanimity, put his Name to this Instrument."
Then he chortles with delight at his performance -- channeling a Founding Father.


