Page 2 of 2   <      

Haymarket's Troubles Get More Public

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

The incident caused her to question the reliability of information provided by Roop. "I should make it clear that I am not stating that the Chief would bring false information, only that I cannot be certain that the facts are accurate," she wrote.

Dupray could not be reached at her private law practice.

When reached, Stutz said she would call back to discuss the issue but did not. She could not be reached after the initial call. Attempts to reach Roop were unsuccessful.

In her letter, Stutz said that legal counsel advised town officials that Dupray's letter should not be disclosed publicly. "Despite an opinion to that effect from legal counsel, a member of the Town Council has elected to disseminate the document," she wrote.

Council member James E. Tobias said he got the letter from Dupray through an e-mail Monday and gave it to other council members. Tobias said that he talked to Stutz about the letter at length and that he thought it should be made public.

Tobias said he had followed the advice of counsel and planned to discuss the letter with council members in a proper forum at the May 1 council meeting.

"It's unfortunate that the letter has somehow been leaked out and placed on a Web site for all to see," he said. "I did not put it there."

Benjamin said the distribution of the letter is not the issue. "Somebody put a stack of them in town hall prior to the candidates' forum" on Thursday night, he said.

Stutz did not make the letter public at the April 3 meeting because she did not want bad publicity so close to the election, said Benjamin, one of the auxiliary officers who lost his volunteer position after the program was suspended.


<       2


More from Virginia

[The Presidential Field]

Blog: Virginia Politics

Here's a place to help you keep up with Virginia's overcaffeinated political culture.

Local Blog Directory

Find a Local Blog

Plug into the region's blogs, by location or area of interest.

FOLLOW METRO ON:
Facebook Twitter RSS
|
GET LOCAL ALERTS:
© 2006 The Washington Post Company