Correction to This Article
A May 26 Metro article about federal discrimination complaints against Manassas incorrectly described the roles of the advocates involved. The Equal Rights Center filed a complaint after a months-long investigation into the city's crowding program. The Equal Rights Center was represented by the Washington Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs, along with the law firm Beveridge and Diamond PC.

HUD to Probe Manassas Anti-Crowding Effort

By Stephanie McCrummen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, May 26, 2006

Federal housing officials said yesterday that they are investigating whether a two-year-old program to combat crowded housing in Manassas is unfairly targeting Hispanic families in violation of the Fair Housing Act.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development filed a complaint Tuesday alleging a pattern of discrimination. Yesterday, a group of Manassas residents and civil rights advocates filed 11 more complaints, saying that the city has selectively enforced its overcrowding rules and other ordinances against Hispanic residents in what amounts to a systematic campaign of harassment.

"We have not heard from white residents that inspectors are knocking on their doors, going in late at night, measuring bedrooms and asking for proof of relationships," said Isabelle Thabault with the Washington Lawyers' Committee, which filed a complaint in conjunction with the Equal Rights Center, another advocacy group. "The only ones we heard from are Hispanic families."

Thabault said her organization's investigation found several cases that seemed to amount to harassment, including one in which an inspector was reported to have measured a bedroom that a couple was sharing with their newborn baby and then told the parents they would have to move the baby to another room. The couple measured the room and found that the inspector's measurement was wrong.

"We found many examples where an inspector went to a household based on an anonymous complaint . . . found no violations then returned a month later and again found no violations," Thabault said, adding that by her count, at least 200 Hispanic residents have been displaced by the city inspections.

Manassas Police Chief John J. Skinner, the acting city manager, said he could not comment on pending complaints.

The scrutiny of the Manassas program comes after the city repealed a controversial ordinance in January that redefined family and made it illegal for relatives such as aunts, uncles and cousins to live together, even if they were not violating household occupancy limits.

According to the complaints filed yesterday, that rule was just the "most egregious" part of a broader program begun in June 2004 that city officials have said is intended to combat crowded housing and its effects. The complaints say the program was "designed to foreclose housing opportunities to Manassas' growing Hispanic population."

The program relies heavily on an "overcrowding hotline," a phone number that residents can call to complain anonymously about neighbors. Calls to the hotline, as well as e-mails and letters, prompt inspections by city officials that are often conducted late at night and without warrants and that, city officials say, have overwhelmingly affected Hispanic families.

To determine whether a house is overcrowded, the city is again relying on its old definition of family, which allows no more than three unrelated people to live under one roof or allows a family to share its home with no more than one unrelated person.

The complaints filed yesterday challenge the legality of those definitions, saying they are overly restrictive and have a disparate impact on Hispanic families.

"While the City has a legitimate interest in the overall number of people who live in a dwelling, it does not have a legitimate interest in dictating to Hispanic residents who they can live with," Thabault said, adding that most municipalities do not have such restrictive definitions and rely instead on occupancy limits designed to protect health and safety.

CONTINUED     1        >

© 2006 The Washington Post Company