Diabetics Not Getting Adequate Treatment, Specialists Contend

By David Brown
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, June 11, 2006

Millions of diabetics are being inadequately treated because of "clinical inertia" on the part of physicians who fail to push doses of diabetes drugs, insulin and blood pressure medications to levels that can best protect patients from the disease and its complications.

That is the conclusion of four studies presented yesterday at the American Diabetes Association's scientific conference being held in the District.

Physicians know that high blood sugar and high blood pressure are dangerous, and appear to understand that certain people -- such as men, the elderly and blacks -- are at higher-than-average risk of problems. But they simply do not act on that knowledge quickly or aggressively, the studies showed.

"There is a lack of physician action in the face of abnormal findings," said Nathaniel G. Clark, a physician and vice president of the association. "We are simply not achieving what we need to in clinical diabetes care."

The studies are the latest addition to the growing body of evidence that millions of Americans get less than optimal health care even when they are insured, well educated and middle class. The findings are especially troubling because they involve a disease -- Type 2 diabetes (once called "adult-onset") -- that affects 21 million Americans and whose prevalence is increasing at the rate of 8 percent a year.

Unanswered by the studies is what practitioners are thinking when they fail to intensify treatment. At a news conference Friday, the first day of the meeting, the researchers speculated that many factors are at work.

Among them are: the difficulty of hitting treatment goals when doctors do try; the time and effort required to start a patient on a new drug; the reluctance of many patients to take more pills or shots; the reality that elevated blood sugar and blood pressure rarely cause symptoms; the distraction of minor but immediate problems, such as sore throats, that patients tend to focus on during doctor visits; and a human tendency to be satisfied with results that are "close enough."

While not dismissing any of those, the researchers said they do not add up to an excuse.

"I think what's important is that these obstacles are overestimated, and physicians really should be doing much more than they are doing now," said Alexander Turchin, an endocrinologist at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, who led a study that found doctors responded to high blood pressure in diabetics less than half as often as they should have.

Guidelines suggest that diabetics should keep their blood pressure below 130/80, because the disease puts them at markedly higher risk of heart attacks. Turchin and his colleagues examined the records of about 12,100 patients treated by more than 500 Harvard-affiliated physicians from 2000 to 2005. The patients were 63 years old on average. About 40 percent were non-white, and slightly more than half were female.

The patients' blood pressure was recorded in two-thirds of the clinic notes, and in 57 percent of those encounters, the readings were above the recommended target. But in only 21 percent of the visits did the doctor do anything about it.

However, the higher the blood pressure, the greater the likelihood the doctor would intervene, the study found. Physicians were also 15 percent more likely to increase the dose of blood pressure medicine or start a new one for a non-white patient or a man -- two groups of diabetics who are at higher-than-usual risk of heart attacks.


CONTINUED     1        >

© 2006 The Washington Post Company