Page 3 of 3   <      

Officer Who Shot Teen at IHOP Not Charged

Outside the Alexandria courthouse, Commonwealth's Attorney S. Randolph Sengel tells reporters about his conclusion.
Outside the Alexandria courthouse, Commonwealth's Attorney S. Randolph Sengel tells reporters about his conclusion. (By Lucian Perkins -- The Washington Post)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

When asked why he thought Stowe fired the shots, Smith told police, "If he heard the engine or saw how fast I was coming . . . he might have thought his life was threatened."

In a later interview, Smith said he swerved to avoid the shots. He tried to go around the officer, he said, but Stowe moved in front of the SUV no matter which way it turned, as if the two "were doing a dance."

Other witnesses in the parking lot contradicted Smith's version, as did the physical evidence, the report said.

Andrew J. Kersey, Smith's attorney, said, "Obviously, my client's account certainly disagrees with several aspects of the commonwealth attorney's conclusions, the big one being where the first shots were fired."

"They definitely have differing versions," Kersey said of the stories told by the teenagers and the officer. "To be fair, this thing happened quickly. It seems like a situation no one had been in before. It's sort of a shocking event, and perceptions can be different."

The shooting, the first this year by an Alexandria officer, sparked outrage and questions over whether the department should revise its policy on firing at vehicles. Officers are allowed to shoot at a moving vehicle if they believe their lives are in danger and no bystanders are at risk -- but only if they have exhausted all other means of defense, including moving out of the vehicle's path.

The policy is similar to those in most Washington area police departments. But some big-city departments, including the District's, restrict the practice because of the risk to bystanders.

Through a spokesman, Police Chief Charles E. Samarra declined to comment on the report or on the department's policy until the internal review has been completed.

Releasing such an exhaustive report of a police investigation is rare. Sengel said he did so because "I think it's important that the public have the best opportunity to understand the basis for why these decisions are made."

Staff writer Tom Jackman contributed to this report.


<          3


More from Virginia

[The Presidential Field]

Blog: Virginia Politics

Here's a place to help you keep up with Virginia's overcaffeinated political culture.

Local Blog Directory

Find a Local Blog

Plug into the region's blogs, by location or area of interest.

FOLLOW METRO ON:
Facebook Twitter RSS
|
GET LOCAL ALERTS:
© 2006 The Washington Post Company