U.S. CAPITOL

Indictment Rejected For Rep. McKinney

Police Union to Study Legal Options

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Eric M. Weiss and Petula Dvorak
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, June 17, 2006

A D.C. grand jury has decided not to indict Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D-Ga.) for scuffling with a U.S. Capitol Police officer this year.

U.S. Attorney Kenneth L. Wainstein issued a statement yesterday saying the decision followed "an extensive and thorough" investigation by a D.C. Superior Court grand jury. The grand jury filed notice with the court that the evidence did not support an indictment, a move that Wainstein said will end the investigation.

"I am relieved that this unfortunate incident is behind me," said McKinney, 51, a six-term House member. "I accept today's grand jury finding of 'no probable cause' as right and just, and the proper resolution of this case."

McKinney said she will be pleased to continue working "without this cloud hanging over me."

The outcome disturbed individual Capitol Police officers, who indicated that they expected McKinney to face charges in a March 29 incident that quickly generated national attention.

However, the Capitol Police department issued a statement last night saying it respected the grand jury's decision and appreciated what it termed an extensive and thorough investigation by the prosecutor's office. The department commended what it described as the professionalism of the officer involved. In the statement, the department also said the matter was diligently presented to the grand jury.

In the March 29 incident, McKinney sidestepped a Longworth House Office Building metal detector -- as House and Senate members are allowed to do. But she was not wearing her lapel pin identifying her as a member, and a police officer -- who did not recognize her -- grabbed her after she ignored his commands to stop. That was when she was alleged to have hit him in the chest.

McKinney, who is black, at first complained that she was a victim of racial profiling and accused the white officer, Paul McKenna, of inappropriately touching her. She also had dubbed the incident "much ado about a hairdo," saying that a hairstyle change this year may have made it harder for police to recognize her.

Capitol Police, meanwhile, urged the U.S. attorney's office to charge McKinney with simple assault, a misdemeanor. Prosecutors chose instead to have the grand jury review the case, and the panel heard testimony from officers and other witnesses.

Even hours before the decision was announced, police expected to hear that McKinney would be charged, said Lou Cannon, president of Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 1.

"We think the facts clearly speak for themselves in this case," Cannon said. "Our initial obvious reaction is disappointment and concern about the message this sends to America."

The police union plans to meet over the weekend to discuss strategy and determine whether it has further legal avenues. It plans to hold a news conference Monday to announce its proposals, Cannon said.


CONTINUED     1        >


More in the Politics Section

Campaign Finance -- Presidential Race

2008 Fundraising

See who is giving to the '08 presidential candidates.

© 2006 The Washington Post Company