| Page 2 of 2 < |
It's Bush's Way or the Highway on Guantanamo Bay
Senate Judiciary Committee members, from left, Orrin Hatch, Arlen Specter and Patrick Leahy are frozen in concentration -- and the same pose -- during a hearing on the treatment of terrorism suspects in U.S. custody.
(Photos By Melina Mara -- The Washington Post)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Specter made a tight smile. "How much evidence should be presented to key people detained in Guantanamo in enemy combatant status?" he queried.
"That's a policy question," Bradbury rejoined, sitting on the edge of his chair.
Specter, irritated, furrowed his brow. "What's your recommendation to Congress to establish the policy?"
Bradbury replied that the matter "should be left up to the Department of Defense."
This prompted a harangue from the chairman. "We're not going to leave it to the Department of Defense or give the Department of Defense a blank check," he said.
Specter should have known he was in trouble when Bradbury ignored the five-minute time limit for opening statements, prompting the chairman to ask, "How much longer will you require?" In the end, Specter let the witnesses have the last word; he had been summoned to the White House. "I'm going to have to excuse myself," the chairman said less than two hours into the proceedings, handing the gavel to Orrin Hatch (R-Utah).
Specter did get one measure of revenge. Early in the session, two women from the left-wing group Code Pink raised signs in the press section demanding: "CLOSE GUANTANAMO." Police stepped in to remove the activists, but Specter whispered instructions to an aide, who told the cops to stand down.
Still, the administration may be correct that lawmakers won't defy Bush on the tribunals. Democrats seemed more eager to talk about other things. Russell Feingold (Wis.) spoke about the wiretapping program, while Joseph Biden (Del.) announced his seventh trip to Iraq. "I'm telling you guys, things ain't good in Happy Valley," he said. Leahy snuck in the word "cockamamie," while Charles Schumer (N.Y.) countered with "lollapalooza."
But Bradbury and Dell'Orto may also have noticed that they were getting less than a full defense from the GOP side. When Bradbury rejected Graham's approach to the tribunals, Graham issued a warning. "If you fight that approach, it's going to be a long, hot summer," he told Bradbury.
When Dell'Orto repeated Bradbury's defiance in a later round of questions, Graham raised his voice. "You didn't consult with us when you created the military commissions," he said. "I'm not going to respond to some product that was enacted without any consultation."
Hatch, wielding Specter's gavel, quickly ended the session and dismissed the witnesses. Graham shook his head and rolled his eyes.



