An Aug. 8 Style article about Oliver Stone and his film "World Trade Center" incorrectly said that Port Authority Officer Dominick Pezzulo died as a result of suicide on Sept. 11, 2001. Pezzulo died after being crushed by debris in the North Tower. In an Aug. 8 Style article about filmmaker Oliver Stone, the marketing company Creative Response Concepts was incorrectly identified as Creative Response Systems.
| Page 2 of 2 < |
America's Character
"It's a movie of the heart, from the heart, about people," the often-adversarial Oliver Stone says of his new film, "World Trade Center." "It's got no baggage, no ideology."
(By Helayne Seidman For The Washington Post)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
"If Bush had spent three months in combat, he would take a whole different view of war," Stone says. He matriculated with the president at Yale but the two never met. "He wouldn't be so light. And that includes Cheney and Rumsfeld. They're tough guys, but combat softens you, if anything. It makes you more aware of human frailty and vulnerability. It doesn't make you a coward, but it does teach you. If any of those guys had seen combat, I don't think we would have had this gratuitous decision to go to Iraq, which has cost us greatly."
On the day before "World Trade Center" will have its New York premiere -- with none of the parties and hoopla that usually attend these be-glittered photo ops -- Stone is relaxed, having just spent the afternoon with his 84-year-old mother, Jacqueline, who lives downtown. Dressed in a crisp khaki suit, lavender polo shirt and mint-green socks, he looks boyish whenever he breaks into that familiar gap-toothed grin, which is often. (Stone turns 60 next month.)
"She has unbelievable strength," he says of his mother, launching into a conversation during which he will prove to be alternately voluble and soft-spoken, defensive and self-deprecating, personal and political. "And she's not a woman who took great care of herself. She partied hard. But it's no Brooke Astor situation." Referring to the recent field day the tabloids have had with the story of Astor's son allegedly neglecting her, Stone says, "It's unfair. He's a good son, I bet. It's like the Mel Gibson thing. It's unfair, the attacks."
But even Stone, who can be and has been accused of just about everything except a sense of irony, can see the irony in being lionized at the very moment Gibson -- the darling of conservatives just a few years ago -- is being drubbed.
"It is weird. It is weird," he says in his soft, New-York-minute cadence. "But everything comes around and everything goes around, right?"
Ups and Downs
During a 45-minute conversation that moves from politics and the movie business to spirituality and artistic morality, Stone will loop back again and again to the fight he always seems to be fighting, about his complicated feelings toward his home country. (Stone lives in Los Angeles.) "I like America, I am American," he says. "There is a great freedom and a great energy here, and an ability to reshape yourself that I love. And you don't find that anywhere else in the world, there's no question. But that doesn't make us right or wrong on everything."
If anyone has reshaped himself, it's Stone, whose career has been a ziggurat of breathtaking highs (he's a three-time Oscar winner) and vertiginous lows. Although "Alexander," his epic biopic starring Colin Farrell as Alexander the Great, was his most recent high-profile flop, he reminds that film's detractors that it didn't perform badly in terms of worldwide box office. Indeed, he counts "Heaven & Earth," his 1993 film about a young Vietnamese woman's journey to America, and "Nixon," his 1995 meditation on the end of Richard Nixon's presidency, as his biggest failures.
When "Nixon" failed, he said, he hit rock bottom. "I'd done 10 movies in 10 years, most of them high-energy, big movies," he says. "It was too much. My balance shifted; I got burned out a bit." He made a thriller ("U-Turn") and a football movie ("Any Given Sunday") and an HBO documentary about Fidel Castro. Then came "Alexander," which he has just reedited a second time, calling the new, three-hour, 45-minute DVD cut "the Cecil B. De Mille Oliver Stone" version.
"You either laugh or you get hurt," he says of the years when critics were dismissing him as once-great. "I allow myself to get hurt. I'm sensitive. . . . But I believe in myself, because you know damn well I come back."
Referring to two of his earliest screenplays, he recalls, "They hated 'Scarface.' 'The Hand,' I didn't work after that. 'Heaven & Earth' hurt me. 'Nixon' really hurt me. But if you don't get hurt, why the hell are you doing it? You put your passion and years in there, if people don't like your movie of course you're hurt. If you say you're not, if you're doing it for some higher great god, that's good. I'd love to say that. But I do have an ability to recover, to repair myself, to come back. And that takes effort. This is not my first comeback."
If "World Trade Center" isn't the first time Stone has survived the vicissitudes of a Hollywood career, it still promises to introduce him to a brand-new audience: young teenagers, who, early market research suggests, are responding to the film as a generational flashpoint similar to what the Kennedy assassination, Vietnam and Watergate represented to their forebears. After a recent test screening, one 14-year-old girl was quoted as saying, "I remember back in 2001 when [the attacks] happened on the news. I kept thinking, 'This isn't real; it's just one of those disaster movies.' ['World Trade Center'] made me feel September 11th was real for the first time."
Stone laughs bemusedly when he hears that, shaking his head. "I like that," he says after taking it in. But doesn't the fact that the cinema has such power to infiltrate the collective consciousness give Stone some pause? Having been accused of trying to convince a generation of filmgoers that the Warren Commission was wrong in 1991's "JFK," then glorifying violence in the 1994 film "Natural Born Killers," did he feel a particular responsibility to audiences with "World Trade Center"?
"I'm responsible to myself," Stone intones, clearly weary of answering the same question 12 years later. "I have my own conscience. If we start to have a collective responsibility, it's a form of censorship. You cannot obey any rules but your own conscience. When you muffle something, you change it. It [becomes] official art. . . . 'Don't you feel that art should be responsible?' is a trick question, to try to get you to say, 'Oh yeah, all art should be responsible.' Responsible to what? The law? The truth? You should draw a line at hate speech, I think, but some filmmakers may not. But it's your choice to see the movie. No one's forcing you to see the movie."
Although at least one widow of a Port Authority police officer requested that her husband's death scene be cut from "World Trade Center" (Stone complied), and another, Jeanette Pezzulo, whose husband's suicide is depicted on film, has called the release of the film "too soon," Stone's movie seems to have been greeted with quiet resignation on the part of Sept. 11 survivors and families. It helped that Paul Greengrass's "United 93," about the United Airlines flight that was overtaken by passengers above Shanksville, Pa., was released to positive reviews this summer (it earned a modest $31 million domestically, and was not considered a hit). "It was very much a different style," Stone says of Greengrass's taut, austere retelling of events. "But I liked it, and it really broke the ice for us." With "World Trade Center's" relatively happy ending, heightened emotions and more conventional Hollywood production values, expectations are high that it will perform better at the box office than its predecessor.
Whether or not it does, chances are that critics -- left, right or Martian -- will once again have Stone to kick around. He doesn't know what his next film will be, but he just saw Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" and calls it "one of the most important documentaries I've ever seen." Earlier this year, when Bill Clinton spoke at Stone's son's Princeton graduation (Stone is on his third marriage, and has three children), the filmmaker approached the former president to buttonhole him about global warming.
"I know he didn't like Gore," Stone says, "but maybe a word in someone's ear could do a lot of good; that's why I went up to him. [I said,] 'You could stop these guys.' " From here talk wanders from the coal industry to journalists' treatment of Gore in 2004 ("They were mean, mean, mean") to, inevitably, Stone's own treatment at the hands of the liberal press. "I guess I'm anathema to all sides," he says cheerfully, wrapping up the conversation. "Poor little me. Poor little Oliver Twisted." He laughs softly, rises to shake hands and begins to primp for a photo shoot. "By the way, how do you make a movie about ecological warming, make it about coal mining and carbon dioxide and make it interesting?" he calls out before turning to leave. "If you see a script, send it to me."


