Page 2 of 2   <      

Gossip Mill Already Grinding For 2007 Election Season

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

· Although Supervisor Sarah R. "Sally" Kurtz (D-Catoctin) doesn't plan to run next year, her mostly rural district is deemed safe for Democrats.

· Most bloggers agree that York would have the advantage in a head-to-head race against Tulloch, whose role in delaying the rural downzoning vote could hurt him with advocates of slow growth.

· Will former state delegate Richard H. "Dick" Black (R) run for office again? If so, bloggers say, he might do more harm than good for Republicans by galvanizing Democrats and independents who find his social conservatism distasteful.

Said a poster known as "Perfect Timing" at tooconservative.com: "This man is no longer electable."

More Information, Please

There's more than a little bit of irony in a Freedom of Information Act request submitted recently by development law firm Reed Smith to state Del. Robert G. Marshall (R-Prince William).

Michael A. Banzhaf of Reed Smith, a well-known development lawyer in Leesburg, asked Marshall for all letters and e-mails regarding a recent Virginia Department of Transportation study that concluded that allowing 28,000 new homes in the Dulles South region of eastern Loudoun would cause gridlock.

The VDOT study was hailed by opponents of the Dulles South proposal, but it was roundly criticized by development representatives, who viewed it as a political stunt orchestrated by Gov. Timothy M. Kaine (D) to build support for the tax increases he is seeking to pay for transportation improvements.

In his letter to Marshall, Banzhaf specifically asked for correspondence provided to VDOT by "others," notably the Piedmont Environmental Council, the slow- growth advocacy group.

What Banzhaf didn't say is why he was asking for the information.

Banzhaf's letter says it was written "on behalf of our client, a Virginia Limited Liability Company" -- but that's as far as it goes. So much for openness.


<       2


More from Virginia

[The Presidential Field]

Blog: Virginia Politics

Here's a place to help you keep up with Virginia's overcaffeinated political culture.

Local Blog Directory

Find a Local Blog

Plug into the region's blogs, by location or area of interest.

FOLLOW METRO ON:
Facebook Twitter RSS
|
GET LOCAL ALERTS:
© 2006 The Washington Post Company