Between the Lines

Our art director looks back at his long, eventful career in Book World.

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Kunio Francis Tanabe
Sunday, September 3, 2006

A few weeks ago, I came across a photograph of movie star Grace Kelly with Frances Scott Fitzgerald, the famous writer's only daughter. It was taken in 1955, at a meeting before a multiple sclerosis benefit dinner here in Washington. Pasted on the back of the photo was a faded clipping from The Washington Post: a 1958 book review of F. Scott Fitzgerald's Afternoon of an Author . This is how the review began:

"Just 36 years ago, my mother, Zelda, reviewed the latest F. Scott Fitzgerald novel, The Beautiful and the Damned , for a New York paper. She went to the point with a directness I admire.

" 'To begin with,' she writes, 'everyone must buy this book for the following esthetic reasons: First, because I know where there's the cutest cloth of gold dress for only $300 in a store on 42d St., and also, if enough people buy it, where there is a platinum ring with a complete circlet, and also if loads of people buy it my husband needs a new winter overcoat, although the one he has has done well enough for the last three years.'

"Here it is 36 years later, and as I sit down to review my father's last, posthumous book I can't help thinking how valid the points my mother made back in 1922 still seem today. Why, I'll even bet that dress she mentioned was cut like the chemise I want so badly."

I have no idea who thought of asking Scottie to review her father's book -- or Zelda her husband's. All for a lark, I'm sure. In writing their reviews, they may have remembered a line from his story "Winter Dreams": "He wanted not association with glittering things and glittering people -- he wanted the glittering things themselves."

Oh, why not, I thought, Gatsby would have understood.

During my long stint here at Book World, I do not recall whether we ever assigned a book to such close kin of an author: friends, enemies and lovers, yes, but always inadvertently. Thirteen years ago, we asked a prominent professor to review a biography of a well-known American figure. In the review she wrote, "The strengths of this exquisite biography . . . are innumerable . . . an engrossing masterpiece . . . a dazzling feat of scholarship." We had no idea that the reviewer and the biographer were good friends, perhaps more. We heard from academics and publishing insiders who knew the nature of their relationship and what a hoot our assignment was.

To protect ourselves from such blunders, for some time we have required reviewers to sign a contract that says in part: "If you have had any contact, friendly or otherwise, with the author of this book, if you have been asked by the publisher to write a blurb for the book, or if there is any possibility of an appearance of a conflict of interest in the assignment of this review to you, please let Book World know immediately." But even with this advisory, we still discover an occasional reviewer who has been all too cozy with the author. The rules of the game are different in England, but that's another story.

Scottie and the Foreign Student

In 1967, I was a college student from Japan, still struggling to connect with a new culture, meandering down the academic corridors at George Washington University with many interests but no aim in sight. By chance, I saw a card on a campus bulletin board advertising a part-time job at The Washington Post. I applied and passed a test to work as a copy aide in the newsroom. What delighted me most in my new environment was the discovery that the daughter of one of my literary heroes worked there. Scottie was a society columnist for the women's section, For and About Women, in the days before it was transformed into the trendier Style. I fetched coffee for Scottie and the other society reporters and helped write the weddings and engagements column. Judith Martin, who later became more famous as "Miss Manners," was a reporter for the section, too. At a recent Book World party, she told me that the daughter of Scott and Zelda preferred to be known as Scottie Lanahan Smith (taking on the names of her husbands, whom she eventually divorced), to avoid the inevitable comparisons with her parents' all-too-famous works. The unbearable heaviness of being an offspring of such glamorous parents was chronicled by Scottie's daughter, Eleanor Lanahan (in Scottie: The Daughter of . . . : The Life of Frances Scott Fitzgerald Lanahan Smith ). "In my next incarnation," Scottie said, "I may not choose again to be the daughter of a Famous Author. The pay is good and there are fringe benefits, but the working conditions are too hazardous."

Some years after Scottie's death in 1986, a group of us in Book World had a heated discussion concerning the meaning of text in literature. This was during the heyday of Jacques Derrida and Paul de Man. Perhaps it was Michael Dirda, my longtime colleague in Book World, who brought up the famous last line of The Great Gatsby (engraved on Fitzgerald's tombstone in Rockville, Md.): "So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past."

No, no, there is no sexual meaning here, one editor said. "Beating on" is a nautical term that means sailing against the wind, tacking or beating the sails, another chimed in. If only we had Scottie around for her inside scoop on the famous novel. I could have told her about my own epiphany when our ship sailed into the Hudson, past Ellis Island, the Statue of Liberty and the Manhattan skyscrapers and arrived at New York harbor after a week-long trans-Atlantic trip. Awaiting at the end of the pier was a green light, its reflection flickering on the water. In an instant, I made that connection to Gatsby , with the light that still beckons lovers of Fitzgerald's romantic prose. And I thought of all the immigrants who had arrived from faraway shores with so much hope, so relieved at last to find the green light.

A Beginning and an Ending

Recently, struck with the reality of my impending retirement, I pored over some faded and crumbling back issues of Book World. Like tasting madeleines dipped in fine aromatic tea, this brought back some very pleasant memories. I recalled how, in 1972, The Washington Post stopped producing a book section in New York in collaboration with another company and started its own. That year Herman Wouk's The Winds of War hit the bestseller list along with Roger Kahn's The Boys of Summer and Richard Bach's Jonathan Livingston Seagull . The Vietnam War was still raging when David Halberstam's The Best and the Brightest came out that fall. William McPherson, who was the daily book editor in Style, headed the new section and hired his former assistant -- me -- along with far more competent writers and editors.


CONTINUED     1        >


Find More Reviews and Features in Books

Who do men say that I am?

Though too cursory to work as an intro to the Gospels, Mary Gordon's "Reading Jesus" should appeal to anyone who wants to wrestle with the problems and paradoxes of the New Testament.

© 2006 The Washington Post Company