Calif. Examining HP's Media-Leak Probe, Firm Says
Method of Obtaining Confidential Phone Records May Have Violated State Law
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Thursday, September 7, 2006
The state of California is looking into methods used by Hewlett-Packard Co. to determine who leaked confidential information to the news media, the company said yesterday.
In documents submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission, the computer company also said it had reviewed private phone records of its board members obtained by a private contractor.
The company said this week that it would not renominate board member George A. Keyworth II, who the company concluded had leaked confidential information about discussions on potential acquisitions and supplier changes during the board's annual off-site strategy meeting in January.
In May, Hewlett-Packard's board of directors asked Keyworth to resign, but he declined. Another board member, Thomas J. Perkins, did resign in protest over the methods used to investigate the leak to the Cnet technology news service.
According to the SEC filing, HP hired a consultant, who hired a contractor to investigate the leak. That contractor used a practice known as "pretexting," which involves deceiving a phone company into believing it is providing information to a real customer.
While "no recording or eavesdropping had occurred . . . some form of 'pretexting' for phone record information . . . had been used," the filing said.
In the case of Perkins, the co-founder of the Silicon Valley venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, the contractor set up a phony e-mail address to access home-phone records through an online billing account. The contractor also posed as Perkins on the phone to access his long-distance records, according to Perkins's lawyer Viet Dinh.
"Obviously, he felt violated and betrayed," Dinh said. "You sign on to become a director. You don't sign on to have your personal phone records fraudulently accessed by nefarious investigators."
According to the SEC filing, the company reviewed phone calls to determine that Keyworth was the source. Keyworth told fellow directors that, if he'd been asked, he would have admitted to being the leak, according to an article on Newsweek magazine's Web site Tuesday.
Keyworth could not be reached for comment yesterday.
"Pretexting" comes in several forms, including special technology that fools automated phone systems. Private investigators sometimes use it to obtain information in divorce cases or other disputes.
This year, AT&T Inc., Sprint Nextel Corp., Verizon Wireless and Cingular Wireless LLC, as well as the state of Florida, have filed lawsuits against data-broker firms that specialize in gathering and marketing data, claiming they fraudulently obtained customers' phone records.






