Confirmation of CIA Prisons Leaves Europeans Mistrustful
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Friday, September 8, 2006
PARIS, President Bush's transfer of terrorism suspects out of secret CIA prisons to the Guantanamo detention facility would do little to repair transatlantic distrust that has grown in recent years, political analysts in France and other European countries said Thursday.
"How willing a really liberal Democrat is to listen to George Bush -- that's about how willing the French are," said Nicole Bacharan, an expert on French-American relations at the Institute for Political Studies in Paris.
Bush's acknowledgment Wednesday of the CIA prisons' existence -- and his refusal to say where they were -- touched off new demands in Europe for a full accounting of the locations. The Washington Post reported last year that some were in Eastern Europe, but it did not name countries at the request of U.S. officials.
Poland and Romania, called likely locations by European investigators, issued new denials Thursday that such prisons were on their soil.
The CIA's detention of the suspects drew support from Australia, a close U.S. ally, where Foreign Minister Alexander Downer told Parliament that "a great deal has been achieved through these kinds of programs." He said that interrogations had led to the arrest of senior terrorism suspects.
U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan, visiting Spain, took an opposing view. "I cannot believe that there can be a trade between the effective fight against terrorism and protection of civil liberties," he said. "If as individuals we are asked to give up our freedom, our liberties, our human rights, as protection against terrorism, do we in the end have protection?"
Asma Jehangir, chairwoman of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, demanded that the United States end the program immediately and apologize for ever bringing it into existence, the Associated Press reported.
"They have to admit that what they did was wrong," said Jehangir, who heads a U.N. panel that recently condemned the detention of suspects at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. "They cannot justify it in the name of terrorism and frightening people."
Some analysts in Europe noted the president's statement that the CIA must use the prisons again in the future. The prisons "have not been liquidated or closed," said Michael Emerson, a senior research fellow at the Center for European Policy Studies in Brussels. If they are going to function again, "then the European body politic is not going to be entirely happy."
François Heisbourg, a military analyst at the Foundation for Strategic Research in Paris, said that people in France find it astounding that U.S. troops had to be told specifically not to employ what are widely viewed here as old torture techniques, particularly the practice known as waterboarding, in which prisoners are made to feel as if they're drowning.
"This hearkens back to one of the favorite practices of the Gestapo -- the bathtub torture, which was a synonym for waterboarding," he said. "The notion that the U.S. Army has to say explicitly that you shouldn't do this is unfortunately a way of saying that it may indeed have been standard operating procedure at the time."
Bush is unlikely "to get much credit for coming clean at this late stage in the story," said Heisbourg. "It's simply being received here as confirmation of what people thought already -- that these guys are doing things they shouldn't be doing."





