Page 2 of 2   <      

Fear and Loathing In the GOP

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

But the good news for the speaker may be temporary, because his support among conservatives is infinitely complicated by his political baggage. It's no secret that conservatives are unhappy with the performance of many GOP officeholders in Washington, from President Bush on down. In particular, they don't like the party's abandonment of fiscal discipline and its failure to restrain the growth of government. They've been complaining for quite a while now, but the Foley scandal has given them a new reason to take shots at the Republican leadership.

When I called David Bossie -- a former Hill investigator who heads an organization called Citizens United and favors Hastert's resignation -- he asked what I thought about the speaker's performance. I told him I wasn't sure. "You're not sure about Hastert on spending?" he asked. "Or on earmarks, or on the utter failure of leadership since he fell into the speakership?"

Bossie seemed genuinely appalled by Hastert's handling of the Foley matter, but he listed other reasons why conservatives are unhappy with Hastert's House. Many conservatives would probably support a change in leadership should Republicans maintain control of the House in November. But they just don't want to rock the boat now, a few weeks before the elections

If we win, they say, then we'll get a new speaker. And if we lose, it's not our problem.

As the week went on, a lot more Republicans joined the smell-a-rat faction. Although they conceded problems with the way the leadership had handled Foley, they were suspicious of how the information came out in dribs and drabs, keeping the story alive day after day. Some of it seemed to originate on a Web site, http://stopsexpredators.blogspot.com , that no one knew much about. Although they didn't have any solid evidence, some Republicans suspected that Democrats were behind it. The speaker was among them. "Hastert believes that with everything in him," Weyrich told me.

Others regarded the Foley matter as a cultural issue as much as a political one. Last Monday, the leaders of a coalition of conservative organizations called the Arlington Group held a conference call to discuss Foley. It included Weyrich, Focus on the Family Chairman James Dobson, American Values President Gary Bauer, Family Research Council President Tony Perkins and American Family Association Chairman Donald Wildmon, among others.

The men agreed that they didn't know enough about the scandal to condemn anyone in the GOP leadership. But they thought that the leadership had gone easy on Foley because, sensitive to charges that Republicans are intolerant, they did not want to be seen as gay-bashers. The coalition members asked Weyrich to draft a statement.

"We are concerned that the early warnings of Mr. Foley's odd behavior toward young male pages may have been overlooked or treated with deference, fearing a backlash from the radical gay rights movement because of Mr. Foley's sexual orientation," the statement said. "It appears that the integrity of the conservative majority has given way to political correctness, trading the virtues of decency and respect for that of tolerance and diversity."

Wildmon later told me that the Foley scandal represents something of a crossroads for the GOP. "Part of the problem Republicans have right now is they have to make up their minds what kind of party they are going to be," he said. "Are they going to be a party of values voters, or are they going to be a party that is for diversity and all the other good buzzwords?"

For all his protestations -- "I'm just a little bitty old preacher in Mississippi" -- Wildmon is an intensely political strategist. But others on the conference call seemed truly dismayed by both parties. "I am not an R, and I am not a D," Phil Burress, president of the Ohio-based Citizens for Community Values, which is affiliated with Focus on the Family, told me.

"Values voters gave up on that a long time ago," he said. "We are thoroughly disgusted with Congress and the way they are conducting business."

byork@nationalreview.com

Byron York covers the White House for National Review.


<       2


© 2006 The Washington Post Company