Your Age to Benefit

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Martha M. Hamilton
Sunday, October 29, 2006

I'll tell you at the outset that when I started looking into the best age to draw Social Security, I assumed that later was better, because it meant a bigger monthly payment.

As it turned out, I was reflecting assumptions embedded in what I know about my own health and family history. My mother, Evelyn McNeil, turned 93 yesterday, so I could probably wait to draw a larger benefit at age 70 with a chance of coming out ahead.

But what's true for me isn't true for everyone.

Take Brian V. Jarvis, whose family history doesn't include that kind of longevity. Jarvis is planning to take Social Security early. And, according to Debra Sabatini Dwyer, an economist with the State University of New York at Stony Brook, both of us might be on the right track.

In research for the Michigan Retirement Research Center, Dwyer found that, based on the specifics of their own lives, on average people make good choices about when to retire and when to start drawing Social Security benefits -- despite the unknowable future.

Jarvis and his wife, both 51, live in Dayton, Ohio, and work for a defense contractor. Both have worked since their late teens and hope to leave the workforce young enough to enjoy retirement.

"When I plan to retire, it will be to retire," he said.

Jarvis, whose hobbies include genealogy, found that in his family the average age of death for men was 63, with a range from 41 to 86. While Jarvis expects to live longer than the average for his family, he says he expects to work until age 62 at the latest, which is the earliest he could draw Social Security.

Under Social Security law, Jarvis, born in 1955, will receive only 74 percent of the monthly benefit to which he would be entitled at age 66 and two months if he takes the payments starting at age 62.

But he and his wife have retirement income other than Social Security to count on, as well as retiree health insurance. Both of them will receive monthly pension payments from their employer, and both are maxing out on contributions to their 401(k) plans and individual retirement accounts.

Rather than depend on Social Security payments to support basic needs, Jarvis plans to invest that money, hoping to earn enough each year to offset the annual cost-of-living adjustment to Social Security and the penalty for taking the benefit early.

"I think it's a very interesting idea," TIAA-CREF chief investment strategist Brett Hammond said of Jarvis's plan. But he raised two caveats. One is that Jarvis might lose money on his Social Security investments. "If you're leaving it in Social Security and taking it out later, there's no risk." The other question Jarvis should consider is whether the decision might have adverse tax consequences, for instance by producing more income while he is in a higher tax bracket.


CONTINUED     1        >

© 2006 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity