Gallaudet's $100 Million Question
|
TOOLBOX
   Resize
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Who's Blogging  |
English professor Kathleen M. Wood argued in a Nov. 2 letter that the new Gallaudet University should not be for everyone.
It should exclude, she said, deaf people who do not wish to be included in what she terms Deaf culture but rather seek to be part of a society that embraces people with and without disabilities.
Ms. Wood maintained that the students, professors and alumni who forced the Gallaudet board to rescind its selection of Jane K. Fernandes as president were motivated by a desire to preserve this notion of an exclusive Deaf culture and its standard of American Sign Language as the true communication method among the deaf and between the deaf and hearing populations.
The public policy question is whether $100 million a year in public money ought to be spent to encourage this noninclusive vision.
FRANK A. NICOLAI
Fort Washington
