| Page 2 of 2 < |
Requiem for Fallen Fighters
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
"This war is so confusing, and most of us live in denial. It's easier to go on our merry way, to take care of the economy, our personal needs," he said. "But we all need to have an awareness of this war. And its costs."
Those who have died are strangers to him. Not one was a member of the parish. And yet, Malm said, the experience of intoning each of their names is profound.
The idea for the requiem came a few years ago from parishioner Mike Hix, a retired Army colonel who served two combat tours in Vietnam as a young man.
He and his wife had traveled to New York one weekend and attended services at the Church of the Heavenly Rest in Manhattan, which was founded in 1865 at the close of the Civil War as a memorial to the soldiers who died in that conflict.
Hix said he sat transfixed as the pastor read the names of the young men and women who had died that week. "As they read those names, it just brought me to tears, and my wife as well," he said. "It was so powerful."
Hix, perhaps more than most, knows that a casualty list is more than a collection of names. "These are real people, with real names. These names have wives and children they've left behind," Hix said.
He suggested the idea to Malm and others at the church. Malm remembers some of the thinking at the time was that, with opinions in the congregation so divided about the war, reading the names every Sunday might prove overwhelming for some. So they compromised: The names would be read at the monthly requiem on Monday.
"I made the point that I didn't consider it a political act," Hix said. "People who support the war certainly believe we should honor the sacrifice of those killed. And those opposed to the war certainly honor and respect the sacrifice as well. I felt this was something we could unite around. We could all agree they deserve our respect."
Especially, he said, because many Americans have found it easy to distance themselves from this war. True, there are 140,000 U.S. troops in Iraq. But, with no military draft, as there was during the Vietnam War, and with no tax increase or national war effort to pay for it, as there was in previous wars, some find it easy to feel disconnected.
That's one reason Malm asked that the numbers of dead be published in the bulletin every week. "It shows the severity of the situation," he said.
Not many people attend the monthly requiem, Malm said, just the usual core of 15 to 20 parishioners, mostly older, those who would come to daily service, anyway. But more than a thousand people know that the names of the fallen are read. "Believe me, we'd hear about it if we stopped," he said.
Malm and Hix keep their personal views on the war to themselves.
But the constant stream of names coming before Malm has had him meditating on the war's costs. What does he think about as he reads the latest list of fatalities? "The profound failure of war," he said. "What has it ever ultimately achieved?"
He thinks that the easy rhetoric of evil and of black-and-white conflict does not square with the complicated modern world. And he wonders: Where are the pacifist voices of those who take to heart the commandment "Thou shalt not kill"? He wonders what would happen if people became less interested in simply defending war and were more open to mercy, understanding and forgiveness.
As Wiggers readied the list of 105 names of those killed in October for the Monday requiem, Malm sighed. "It's just so sad."


