Abizaid Says Withdrawal Would Mean More Unrest

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Thomas E. Ricks and Ann Scott Tyson
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, November 16, 2006

The top U.S. commander for Iraq told Congress yesterday that a phased withdrawal of American troops would unleash more sectarian strife, and instead he advocated a "major change" in strategy that would beef up U.S. military teams training Iraqi forces.

Gen. John P. Abizaid, chief of the U.S. Central Command, said bolstering the training effort could require a further increase in the number of U.S. troops in Iraq, already higher than expected at more than 140,000, and said no cuts are planned.

Facing searing questions from Democrats and Republicans alike, some of whom voiced disappointment in Abizaid and questioned his credibility, the general acknowledged mistakes in the war effort. But he voiced optimism that Iraq's military can stabilize the country, given enough U.S. backing and political support from Iraq's government.

"We haven't misled people. We have learned some hard lessons," he said in one tense exchange before the Senate Armed Services Committee.

The first major Iraq hearings since the Nov. 7 midterm elections revealed blunt impatience among Democrats as well as open frustration from Republicans, and produced the rare spectacle of presidential hopefuls from both parties taking aim at the general.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) took exception with Abizaid's talk of all the steps that the Iraqi government needs to take. "Hope is not a method," she told him. "We've had testimony now for four years about what 'must be done' -- and it doesn't get done."

Abizaid shot back: "I would also say that despair is not a method."

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), another presidential contender, voiced disappointment that Abizaid seemed to be clinging to the "status quo" -- an assertion the general rejected.

In an unusual admission, Abizaid said there should have been more U.S. troops, as well as Iraqi and foreign forces, to stabilize the country immediately after the U.S.-led invasion in March 2003. "General [Eric] Shinseki was right that a greater international force contribution, U.S. force contribution and Iraqi force contribution should have been available immediately after major combat operations," he said.

Abizaid also said the policy of "de-Baathification" of Iraq society introduced in 2003 by then-U.S. Proconsul L. Paul Bremer was too severe.

Under hard questioning from McCain, Abizaid spoke frankly about the stress on U.S. forces, which he said constrains any major troop increase. "We can put in 20,000 more Americans tomorrow and achieve a temporary effect. But when you look at the overall American force pool that's available out there, the ability to sustain that commitment is simply not something that we have right now with the size of the Army and the Marine Corps," he said. He later told a House panel that exceeding current troop levels would place "a tremendous strain" on the Army.

McCain, who favors a significant boost in U.S. forces, quizzed Abizaid on why more troops have not been sent to the Sunni insurgent stronghold of Anbar province, where U.S. casualties are among the highest in Iraq and Marine commanders say they lack sufficient forces.


CONTINUED     1        >

More Iraq Coverage

Big Bombings

Big Bombings

Interactive: Track some of the deadliest attacks in Iraq.
Full Coverage

facebook

Connect Online

Share and comment on Post world news on Facebook and Twitter.

America at War

Leaving Iraq

Coverage of Iraq's transition as the U.S. prepares to depart.

© 2006 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity