Thinking Beyond English in the Classroom

Fairfax Commits to Study Of Foreign Languages

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Sunday, November 26, 2006

"Doesn't everyone everywhere speak English?"

"I took four years of high school French and couldn't understand anything when I got to Paris."

"How can we teach a foreign language to young kids when they are just learning their own language?"

For years, many Americans have dismissed foreign language study as useless, futile or even harmful.

Why, then, has the Fairfax County School Board decided that one of its major goals is that eventually every graduate will be competent in a foreign language?

First, board members looked around America and the rest of the world. They saw that many, if not most, developed countries required students to learn at least one foreign language. They saw that when these countries' diplomats, journalists, salespeople and soldiers are in a country that speaks a different language, they are much more likely to know something about that language than are Americans. This is particularly apparent in the Washington area, where so many diplomats, journalists, salespeople and soldiers are based. Washington, with its inherent resources, is able to support almost any language.

Second, the board saw that other countries were ensuring second-language competence by teaching languages to very young children and continuing foreign-language instruction throughout the students' schooling. The best

language-learning period is before puberty.

So, the board decided to move toward foreign-language competence for all students and to start instruction in early elementary school.

What language? Knowing any foreign language is better than not learning one, but individual schools and students have particular reasons for choosing one language over another. Each elementary school will work with its community to determine what language(s) to offer, and middle and high schools will continue to offer choices. We are already offering nationally critical languages such as Arabic, Chinese, Korean and Russian. With the help of federal grants, we are expanding offerings and creating closed-circuit

remote-learning opportunities in Chinese and Arabic.

One of the challenges is to find qualified teachers in these languages and to enroll enough students to fill classrooms in some schools. So we can no longer rely on traditional methods of delivering instruction. Remote learning appears to offer an efficient, cost-effective alternative.


CONTINUED     1        >


More Washington Post Opinions

PostPartisan

Post Partisan

Quick takes from The Post's opinion writers.

Washington Sketch

Washington Sketch

Dana Milbank writes about political theater in the capital.

Tom Toles

Tom Toles

See his latest editorial cartoon.

© 2006 The Washington Post Company