Bolivian Senate OKs Sweeping Land Reform
|
|
Wednesday, November 29, 2006; 2:34 AM
LA PAZ, Bolivia -- President Evo Morales signed ambitious land reforms into law late Tuesday night in a boisterous ceremony that packed the presidential palace with cheering Indian supporters.
Standing shoulder-to-shoulder on the parquet floor of the palace's main hall, indigenous groups from across Bolivia lauded Morales' bid to seize some land held by wealthy elites and redistribute it to the landless poor.
"This is the struggle of our ancestors, the struggle for power and territory," Morales told the crowd. "Now, the change is in our hands."
Bolivia's Senate approved the reforms on Tuesday after a weeklong boycott by opposition lawmakers who attempted to block the bill's passage.
The impasse ended after thousands of Indian protesters from around the country marched on the capital La Paz in support of Morales' proposal.
Conservative leaders walked out of the Senate last week to block the land reform bill. Morales had threatened to circumvent Congress and impose the law by presidential decree if the Senate did not reconvene by Tuesday afternoon.
Morales hopes the ambitious proposal will eventually allow his government to redistribute some 77,000 square miles of land _ an area about the size of Nebraska.
"It is not possible, my friends, to have so much land in so few hands, and so many hands without land," Morales told about 10,000 supporters in a plaza in La Paz before the vote.
The bill passed 15-0 with the remainder of the 27 senators absent from vote.
The conservative opposition party Podemos holds 13 of the Senate's 27 seats. With help from two senators from minor opposition parties, Podemos previously prevented the body from reaching a 14-seat quorum. Morales' Movement Toward Socialism party, or MAS, has 12 Senate seats.
But Tuesday night, one Podemos senator returned to the chamber to vote for the land reform, joined by assistants filling in for two other opposition senators.
Bolivian senators' assistants are allowed to cast ballots for their absent senators, but only according to the senators' wishes. And it was not immediately clear whether the assistants' votes would hold up to legal scrutiny.


