New Type 2 Diabetes Drug Delays Disease Progression
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Monday, December 4, 2006; 12:00 AM
MONDAY, Dec. 4 (HealthDay News) -- One of a new class of diabetes drugs delayed the progression of type 2 diabetes along with the need to add additional medications.
But it's not clear how the findings will affect actual practice because diabetes drugs tend to involve a complicated constellation of benefits and side effects.
In particular, this drug, Avandia (rosiglitazone), resulted in blood sugar staying normal longer but carried with it various cardiovascular risks and is expensive.
"You have to take into consideration the potential benefit versus the potential risk," said Dr. Robert Rizza, past president of the American Diabetes Association and professor of medicine at the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine in Rochester, Minn.
The results of the trial are even less encouraging when taken in concert with a previous study that also found an excess of cardiovascular events.
"Because of the fact that adverse cardiovascular events went in the wrong direction in the [previous] trial and because they go in the wrong direction in this trial, I have concerns about the overall benefit of rosiglitazone in diabetic patients who are highly vulnerable to adverse cardiovascular outcomes, and this is not, in my view, a very favorable result," said Dr. Steven E. Nissen, interim chairman of the department of cardiovascular medicine at the Cleveland Clinic.
"Something is happening here which has pretty profound public health implications," added Nissen, who recently uncovered cardiac problems with muraglitazar, a not-yet-approved diabetes drug in the same class as Avandia, and published those findings in theJournal of the American Medical Association.
The new study appears in the Dec. 7 issue of theNew England Journal of Medicineand is being released early to coincide with a presentation Monday at the World Diabetes Congress in Cape Town, South Africa.
More than 20 million people in the United States have type 2 diabetes, the most common form of the disease. People with this condition either don't produce enough insulin, or cells in the body don't utilize the hormone efficiently. Insulin is essential for transporting sugar from the blood to cells for energy. Keeping blood sugar levels normal or nearly normal is critical to reducing the risk of the long-term complications of diabetes such as heart disease, nerve damage, kidney damage, blindness and amputations.
According to an accompanying editorial in the journal, the approval of five new classes of anti-diabetes drugs in the past decade has left doctors unsure of which to use first or how to combine them with other drugs. In particular, it hasn't been clear how the class of drugs known as thiazolidenediones, which includes Avandia and muraglitazar, compare with other glucose-lowering medications. These drugs work by sensitizing muscle, liver and fat tissue to insulin.
This study compared 4,360 newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients receiving either Avandia (rosiglitazone, a thiazoidinedione made by GlaxoSmithKline); glyburide (Micronase); or metformin (Glucophage). Prior to the study, participants had not taken any medications for diabetes.
The trial was sponsored by Glaxo, and study lead author Dr. Steven Kahn disclosed having served as a consultant and speaker for the company.



